

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
2.地震灾害防治应急管理部重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
Received:14 January 2024,
Revised:2024-01-28,
Published:15 February 2024
移动端阅览
蒋伟,王永志,袁晓铭等.2023年甘肃积石山Ms6.2地震宏观灾害特征与若干思考[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2024,44(01):1-11.
JIANG Wei,WANG Yongzhi,YUAN Xiaoming,et al.Macroscopic Hazard Characteristics of the 2023 Gansu Jishishan Ms6.2 Earthquake and Some Proposals[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2024,44(01):1-11.
蒋伟,王永志,袁晓铭等.2023年甘肃积石山Ms6.2地震宏观灾害特征与若干思考[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2024,44(01):1-11. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.20240114002.
JIANG Wei,WANG Yongzhi,YUAN Xiaoming,et al.Macroscopic Hazard Characteristics of the 2023 Gansu Jishishan Ms6.2 Earthquake and Some Proposals[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2024,44(01):1-11. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.20240114002.
2023年12月18日甘肃省积石山县发生了
M
s
6.2地震,与以往同等级地震相比,其表现出“同震重灾”特征和引发了特殊流滑地质灾害。通过现场震害调查、走访受灾群众和搜集地质资料及相关文献,重点探讨了本次地震的发震背景和孕育地质条件,对比了宏观烈度分布特征及与仪器烈度差异,统计了不同民居房屋的典型震害特征及所占比例,调查了造成人员伤亡的主要成因;踏勘了次生流滑灾害宏观特征,对揭示其成因与触发条件提出了若干关键问题。结果表明:宏观与仪器烈度具有较为明显差异,原因主要为地形地质条件复杂、不同乡镇经济发展水平与房屋抗震设防能力差异及烈度仪布设缺乏统一标准;强震观测记录地表加速度明显大于2021年漾濞
M
s
6.4地震,烈度Ⅵ、Ⅶ、Ⅷ区面积分别为2022年芦山
M
s
6.1地震的2.3、1.5、2.5倍,为造成同级地震重灾的一个重要成因;泥流掩埋摧毁房屋、炕头相连淋浴间隔墙倒塌及地震发生在深夜是造成本次地震人员伤亡重的重要因素。流滑区域长约3 km,前后高程差约85 m,总面积约39万m
2
,漫出地面约3 m高,塌陷区残留若干孤岛,其可能为长期农田灌溉、地下水体富集、地震主振方向与泥流运动和天然沟谷方向相同等外在因素和黄土湿陷、土体液化等内在机理综合诱发,具体成灾诱因、物理机制和触发条件需多种手段联合验证。调查证明,按照抗震设防标准进行房屋建设和既有建筑加固,强化农村居民防震减灾意识和应急避难知识,是减轻地震造成人员伤亡的有效措施。
On December 18, 2023, a
M
s
6.2 earthquake struck Jishishan County, Gansu Province, showing the characteristics of "similar seismic magnitude but heavy disaster" and triggering special flowslide geologic hazards compared to previous earthquakes of the same magnitude. Through surveying the on-site seismic damage, visiting the quake-affected people, collecting geological data and consulting related literature, the seismogenic background and geological conditions of this earthquake were investigated. The comparison of the distribution differences between instrumental intensity and macro intensity, the statistics on the typical seismic damage characteristics of different residential houses and their proportion, and the investigation on the main causes of casualties were also carried out. The macro features of secondary flowslide disasters were detected, and some key questions about the cause and triggering of the earthquake were proposed. The results show that there are obvious differences between the instrumental and macroscopic intensities, mainly due to the complex topographic and geological conditions, the differences in economic development levels and seismic fortification capabilities of buildings in different townships, and the lack of a consistent standard for the deployment of the intensity instrumentation; the surface acceleration recorded in the strong-seismic observation is obviously greater than that in the 2021 Yangbi
M
s
6.4 earthquake, and the areas with intensities Ⅵ, Ⅶ, and Ⅷ are 2.3, 1.5, and 2.5 times of those in the 2022 Lushan
M
s
6.1 earthquake, respectively. These are important reasons that cause severe damage although having similar magnitude; the main factors causing heavy casualties in this earthquake include the burial and destruction of houses by mudslides, the collapse of shower walls connected to the kang, and the occurrence of the earthquake in the late night. The flowslide area is about 3 km long, with an elevation difference of about 85 m between the front and back, and an area of about 390,000 m
2
. It spread out to a height of about 3 m above the ground, leaving behind several isolated islands in the collapse area, which may be triggered by a combination of external factors such as long-term irrigation of farmland, enrichment of the underground water, and the direction of the seismic main vibration being the same as that of the flowslide movement and the natural valley direction, and the intrinsic mechanisms such as wet subsidence of loess, liquefaction of the soil, and so on. The specific causes of the disaster, the physical mechanisms, and the triggering conditions need to be verified jointly by various means. The survey proved that building construction and existing building reinforcement in accordance with seismic fortification standards and strengthening the awareness of earthquake prevention and mitigation and the knowledge of emergency evacuation of rural residents are effective measures to reduce the casualties caused by earthquakes.
王立朝 , 侯圣山 , 董英 , 等 . 甘肃积石山 M s 6.2级地震的同震地质灾害基本特征及风险防控建议 [J/OL]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报 , http://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2852.p.20231228.1352.002 http://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2852.p.20231228.1352.002 .
Wang L C , Hou S S , Dong Y , et al . Basic characteristics of co‑seismic geological hazards induced byJishishan M s 6 . 2 earthquake and suggestions for their risk control[J/OL]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control , http://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2852.p.20231228. 1352.002. http://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2852.p.20231228.1352.002. (in Chinese)
戴必辉 , 陶忠 , 徐国林 , 等 . 云南漾濞Ms6.4级地震震中区农房震害调查 [J]. 世界地震工程 , 2021 , 37 ( 3 ): 9 ‑ 18 .
Dai B H , Tao Z , Xu G L , et al . Investigation of seismic damage to rural houses in the epicenter area of YangbiMs 6.4 earthquake in Yunnan [J]. World Earthquake Engineering , 2021 , 37 ( 3 ): 9 ‑ 18 . (in Chinese)
潘毅 , 袁家聪 , 林拥军 , 等 . 泸定6.8级地震农村居住建筑震害调查与分析 [J]. 防灾减灾工程学报 , 2023 , 43 ( 6 ): 1200 ‑ 1214 .
Pan Y , Yuan J C , Lin Y J , et al . Investigation and analysis of rural residential buildings in Luding M 6.8 earthquake [J] Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering , 2023 , 43 ( 6 ): 1200 ‑ 1214 . (in Chinese)
许强 , 彭大雷 , 范宣梅 , 等 . 甘肃积石山6.2级地震触发青海中川乡液化型滑坡‑泥流特征与成因机理 [J]. 武汉大学学报 , 2024 , DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240007 http://dx.doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20240007 .
Xu Q , Peng D L , F X M , et al . Preliminary study on the characteristics and initiation mechanism of Zhongchuan Town flowslidetriggered by Jishishan M s 6.2 earthquake in Gansu Province [J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University , 2024 , DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20240007. http://dx.doi.org/10.13203/j.whugis20240007. (in Chinese)
李为乐 , 许强 , 李雨森 , 等 . 2023年积石山 M s 6.2级地震同震地质灾害初步分析 [J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版) , 2024 , 51 ( 1 ): 33 - 45, 90 .
Li W L , Xu Q , Li Y S , et al . Preliminary analysis of co‑seismic geohazards induced by the 2023 Jishishan M s 6.2 earthquake [J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition) , 2024 , 51 ( 1 ): 33 - 45, 90 . (in Chinese)
邵若潼 , 沈旭章 , 张元生 . 青藏高原东北缘甘东南地区地壳各向异性特征及构造意义 [J]. 地球物理学报 , 2019 , 62 ( 9 ): 3340 ‑ 3353 .
Shao R T , Shen X Z , Zhang Y S . Crustal anisotropy and tectonic implications beneath southeastern Gansu province in northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics , 2019 , 62 ( 9 ): 3340 ‑ 3353 . (in Chinese)
徐钦 , 田秀丰 , 王维欢 , 等 . 2013年甘肃岷县—漳县6.6级地震仪器烈度与宏观调查烈度比较分析 [J]. 地震工程学报 , 2018 , 40 ( 1 ): 124 - 129 .
Xu Q , Tian X F , Wang W H , et al . A comparison and analysis of instrumental intensity and macroseismic survey intensity of the 2013 Minxian-Zhangxian M s 6.6 earthquake in Gansu Province [J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal , 2018 , 40 ( 1 ): 124 - 129 . (in Chinese)
中国地震烈度表 : GB/T 17742—2020 [S]. 北京 : 中国标准出版社 , 2020 .
王红蕾 , Walter D.Mooney . 芦山 M w 6.6级地震烈度调查及北美震例对比分析 [J]. 地震工程与工程振动 , 2014 , 34 ( 增1 ): 108 ‑ 117 .
Wang H L , Mooney W D . Investigation of the Lushan M w 6.6 earthquake intensity and comparative analysis of earthquake cases in North America [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics , 2014 , 34 ( Sup1 ): 108 ‑ 117 . (in Chinese)
孙柏涛 , 闫佳琦 , 李山有 . 宏观地震烈度发展与其用途的演变 [J]. 地震工程与工程振动 , 2019 , 39 ( 2 ): 1 ‑ 8 .
Sun B T , Yan J Q , Li S Y . The development of macroseismic intensity and the evolution of its use [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics , 2019 , 39 ( 2 ): 1 ‑ 8 . (in Chinese)
中华人民共和国应急管理部 . 甘肃积石山6.2级地震烈度图 [EB/OL]. ( 2023-12-22 )[ 2024-01-28 ]. https://www.mem.gov.cn/xw/yjglbgzdt/202312/t20231222_472849.shtml https://www.mem.gov.cn/xw/yjglbgzdt/202312/t20231222_472849.shtml
甘肃省地震局 . 基于遥感影像和经验估计的甘肃省临夏回族自治州积石山县房屋抗震能力初步评估图 . https://www.gsdzj.gov.cn/info/1026/1193.html
许娟 , 赵雪慧 , 周琪 , 等 . 2022年四川泸定Ms6.8地震人员震亡特征分析 [J]. 地震研究 , 2023 , 46 ( 4 ): 603 ‑ 610 .
Xu J , Zhao X H , Zhou Q , et al . Features of the casualty by the 2022 Luding, Sichuan Ms6. 8 earthquake [J]. Journal of Seismological Research , 2023 , 46 ( 4 ): 603 ‑ 610 . (in Chinese)
中国地震动参数区划图 : GB18306—2015 [S]. 北京 : 中国标准出版社 , 2015 .
中国地震局工程力学研究所强震动观测中心 . 甘肃积石山6.2级地震(第2报) [R]. 北京 : 中国地震局工程力学研究所 , 2023 .
中华人民共和国应急管理部中国地震应急搜救中心 . 甘肃积石山6.2级地震青海省民和县中川乡金田村地质灾害震后无人机影像 [EB/OL]. ( 2023-12-25 )[ 2024-01-28 ]. https://www.nerss.cn/eportal/ui?pageId=594939&articleKey=766976&columnId=647457 https://www.nerss.cn/eportal/ui?pageId=594939&articleKey=766976&columnId=647457
王兰民 , 柴少峰 , 薄景山 , 等 . 黄土地震滑坡的触发类型、特征与成灾机制 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 2023 , 45 ( 8 ): 1543 ‑ 1554 .
Wang L M , Chai S F , Bao J S , et al . Triggering types, characteristics and disaster mechanism of seismic loesslandslides [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 2023 , 45 ( 8 ): 1543 ‑ 1554 . (in Chinese)
张晓超 , 裴向军 , 张茂省 , 等 . 强震触发黄土滑坡流滑机理的试验研究——以宁夏党家岔滑坡为例 [J]. 工程地质学报 , 2018 , 26 ( 5 ): 1219 ‑ 1226 .
Zhang X C , Pei X J , Zhang M S , et al . Experimental study on mechanism of flow slide of loess landslides triggered by strong earthquake‑A case study in Dangiacha, Ningxia province [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology , 2018 , 26 ( 5 ): 1219 ‑ 1226 . (in Chinese)
Kiyota T , Furuichi H , Hidayat R F , et al . Overview of long‑distance flow‑slide caused by the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake, Indonesia [J]. Soils and Foundations , 2020 , 60 ( 3 ): 722 ‑ 735 .
0
Views
0
下载量
7
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
苏公网安备32010202012147号