Seismic Performance Levelsand Intensity Index of Shallow‑buried Underground Structure by Numerical Statistical Method

WANG Wei; YANG Jing; ZHANG Guangyu; ZHUANG Haiyang

doi:10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.20210827002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Seismic Performance Levelsand Intensity Index of Shallow‑buried Underground Structure by Numerical Statistical Method

更新时间：2025-09-25

- Seismic Performance Levelsand Intensity Index of Shallow‑buried Underground Structure by Numerical Statistical Method
- Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering Vol. 43, Issue 4, Pages: 732-741(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  南京工业大学岩土工程研究所，江苏南京 210009
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.20210827002
  CLC： TU352.4;TU93
- Received：27 August 2021，
  
  Revised：2021-10-25，
  
  Published：28 August 2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王伟,杨靖,张广宇等.基于数值统计的浅埋地下结构地震动强度指标与抗震性能水平划分研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2023,43(04):732-741.

WANG Wei,YANG Jing,ZHANG Guangyu,et al.Seismic Performance Levelsand Intensity Index of Shallow‑buried Underground Structure by Numerical Statistical Method[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2023,43(04):732-741.
王伟,杨靖,张广宇等.基于数值统计的浅埋地下结构地震动强度指标与抗震性能水平划分研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2023,43(04):732-741. DOI： 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.20210827002.

WANG Wei,YANG Jing,ZHANG Guangyu,et al.Seismic Performance Levelsand Intensity Index of Shallow‑buried Underground Structure by Numerical Statistical Method[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2023,43(04):732-741. DOI： 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.20210827002.

摘要

现阶段地下结构易损性分析还处于初步研究阶段，以单层双跨的日本大开车站为原型，建立了土与单层地下结构动力相互作用的有限元模型。首先根据地震动的频率，选取地震动；再采用增量动力时程分析方法（IDA），给出了地下结构地震损伤状态的判定与定量划分方法，最后挑选出合适的地震强度指标（IM）。分析结果表明，基于

PGA

（地表峰值加速度）

/PGV

（地表峰值速度）分类的地震动记录在IDA曲线上表现出显著的差异，地震动选取的合理性以及随机性是地下结构地震易损性曲线客观性的重要保证；峰值地面加速度（

PGA

）与场地土层顶底峰值相对位移（

PSSRD

）均可作为该类浅埋矩形地下结构地震易损性分析的有效且合适的地震动强度指标。基于场地的非线性地震反应特征，对于深埋地下结构的地震动强度指标还有待进一步研究。

Abstract

The studies on the vulnerability analysis of underground structures are still in the preliminary stages. This paper uses the single-story double-span Daikai station in Japan as a prototype to establish a finite element model the investigate the dynamic interaction between soil and single-story underground structures. First， select the ground motion according to its frequency； then use the incremental dynamic analysis method （IDA） to give the determination and quantitative division method of the seismic damage state of the underground structure， finally select the suitable seismic intensity measure （IM）. The results show that the ground motion records based on

PGA

（peak ground acceleration）/

PGV

（peak ground velocity） classification show significant differences on the IDA curve， thus， the rationality and randomness of ground motion selection are important guarantees for the objectivity of seismic vulnerability curve of underground structure. The peak ground acceleration （

PGA

） and the peak site surface relative displacement （

PSSRD

） can be used as an effective and suitable ground dynamometer for seismic vulnerable analysis of such shallow rectangular underground structures. For the deeply buried underground structure， the intensity index for its seismic performance should be studied further.

关键词

Keywords

references

Lu D C ， Wu C Y ， Ma C ， et al . A novel segmental cored column for upgrading the seismic performance of underground frame structures ［J］. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering ， 2020 ， 131 ： 106011 .

Konagai K ， Takatsu S ， Kanai T ， et al . Kizawa tunnel cracked on 23 October 2004 Mid‑Niigata earthquake： An example of earthquake‑induced damage to tunnels in active‑folding zones ［J］. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering ， 2009 ， 29 （ 2 ）： 394 ‑ 403 .

Wang W L ， Wang T T ， Su J J ， et al . Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi‑Chi Earthquake ［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology ， 2001 ， 16 （ 3 ）： 133 ‑ 150 .

Zhang X P ， Jiang Y J ， Sugimoto S . Seismic damage assessment of mountain tunnel： A case study on the Tawarayama tunnel due to the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology ， 2018 ， 71 ： 138 ‑ 148 .

Yu H T ， Chen J T ， Yuan Y ， et al . Seismic damage of mountain tunnels during the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake ［J］. Journal of Mountain Science ， 2016 ， 13 （ 11 ）： 1958 ‑ 1972 .

陈龙伟，袁晓铭，孙锐 . 2011年新西兰 M w6.3地震液化及岩土震害述评［J］. 世界地震工程， 2013 ， 29 （ 3 ）： 1 ‑ 9 .

Chen L W ， Yuan X M ， Sun R . Review of liquefaction phenomena and geotechnical damage in the 2011 New Zealand M w6. 3 earthquake ［J］. World Earthquake Engineering ， 2013 ， 29 （ 3 ）： 1 ‑ 9 . （in Chinese）

Shinozuka M ， Feng M Q ， Lee J ， et al . Statistical analysis of fragility curves ［J］. Journal of Engineering Mechanics‑ASCE ， 2000 ， 126 （ 12 ）： 1224 ‑ 1231 .

Christopher R ， Roland L S . ATC‑13： Earthquake damage evaluation data for California ［R］. Redwood City ： Applied Technology Council ， 1985 .

NIBS . HAZUS‑MH： technical manuals ［R］. Washington ： Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Institute of Building Science ， 2004 .

Zhong Z L ， Shen Y Y ， Zhao M ， et al . Seismic fragility assessment of the Daikai subway station in layered soil ［J］. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering ， 2020 ， 132 ： 106044 .

Liu T ， Chen Z Y ， Yuan Y ， et al . Fragility analysis of a subway station structure by incremental dynamic analysis ［J］. Advances in Structural Engineering ， 2017 ， 20 （ 7 ）： 1111 ‑ 1124 .

Huh J ， Tran H Q ， Haldar A ， et al . Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a shallow two‑story underground rc box structure ［J］. Applied Sciences ， 2017 ， 7 （ 7 ）： 735 .

He Z M ， Chen Q J . Vertical Seismic effect on the seismic fragility of large‑space underground structures ［J］. Advances in Civil Engineering ， 2019 ： 1 ‑ 17 .

Tso W K ， Zhu T J ， Heidebrecht A C . Engineering implication of ground motion A/V ratio ［J］. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering ， 1992 ， 11 （ 3 ）： 133 ‑ 144 .

Cornell A C ， Jalayer F ， Hamburger O R ， et al . Probabilistic basis for 2000 sac federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines ［J］. Journal of Structural Engineering ， 2002 ， 128 （ 4 ）： 526 ‑ 533 .

Andreotti G ， Lai C G . Use of fragility curves to assess the seismic vulnerability in the risk analysis of mountain tunnels ［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology ， 2019 ， 91 ： 103008 .

Zhuang H Y ， Chen G X . A viscous‑plastic model for soft soil under cyclic loadings ［J］. Geotechnical special publication of ASCE ， 2006 ， 150 ： 343 ‑ 350 .

Zhuang H Y ， Wang R ， Shi P X ， et al . Seismic response and damage analysis of underground structures considering the effect of concrete diaphragm wall ［J］. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering ， 2019 ， 116 ： 278 ‑ 288 .

Lee J H ， Fenves G L . Plastic‑damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures ［J］. Journal of Engineering Mechanics‑ASCE ， 1998 ， 124 （ 8 ）： 892 ‑ 900 .

Vamvatsikos D ， Cornell C A . Incremental dynamic analysis ［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics ， 2002 ， 31 （ 3 ）： 491 ‑ 514 .

地下结构抗震设计标准： GB/T 51336—2018 ［S］. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社， 2018 .

Padgett J E ， Nielson B G ， Desroches R . Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios ［J］. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamic ， 2008 ， 37 （ 5 ）： 711 ‑ 725 .

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Numerical Simulation Analysis of Surface Rupture‑Foundation‑Frame Structure Interaction under Fault Action

Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study on Combustion Characteristics of Multifunctional Massage Chairs

Research on Instability and Collapse of Seismic Slopes Based on Continuous‑discontinuous Method

Study on Effect of Subgrade Moisture Variation on Pavement Mechanical Response in Rainy Regions

Modification of UHPC Penetration Coefficients Based on Numerical Simulation and Optimization of Berezan Formula

Related Author

CHEN Bowei

XU Longjun

TIAN Hao

LIU Chang

ZHANG Yang

ZHANG Jian

CHEN Haidong

ZENG Jie

Related Institution

Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration

State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Jianghan University

School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology

Yunnan Fire and Rescue Corps

⁰