Comparison Study on Results of Site Seismic Response between Characteristic⁃difference Method and Equivalent Linear Method

Zhaolun YAN; Xiaobo PENG

doi:10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.201912021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparison Study on Results of Site Seismic Response between Characteristic⁃difference Method and Equivalent Linear Method

更新时间：2025-09-25

- Comparison Study on Results of Site Seismic Response between Characteristic⁃difference Method and Equivalent Linear Method
- Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering Vol. 41, Issue 6, Pages: 1222-1227(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.江苏省地震局,江苏南京 210014
  2.中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京 100081
  3.防灾科技学院,河北三河 065201
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.201912021
  CLC： TU443
- Published：15 December 2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
鄢兆伦,彭小波.场地地震反应的特征线解与等效线性化解对比研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2021,41(06):1222-1227.

YAN Zhaolun,PENG Xiaobo.Comparison Study on Results of Site Seismic Response between Characteristic⁃difference Method and Equivalent Linear Method[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2021,41(06):1222-1227.
鄢兆伦,彭小波.场地地震反应的特征线解与等效线性化解对比研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2021,41(06):1222-1227. DOI： 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.201912021.

YAN Zhaolun,PENG Xiaobo.Comparison Study on Results of Site Seismic Response between Characteristic⁃difference Method and Equivalent Linear Method[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2021,41(06):1222-1227. DOI： 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.201912021.

摘要

研究了响蹚（Ⅱ类）、盐城（Ⅳ类）、CHBH06（Ⅲ类）3种不同类别的场地在地震动作用下特征线差分计算结果与等效线性化法计算结果的差异性。在响蹚场地（Ⅱ类）下，随输入地震动峰值增加，特征线法计算的峰值加速度逐渐增加，反应谱曲线规律性递增；等效法计算峰值加速度先减小后增加，反应谱曲线在较大输入时逐渐递增。在盐城场地（Ⅳ类）下，特征线法计算的峰值加速度均比等效法的计算值稍大，反应谱平台宽度较等效法反应谱平台宽度宽。在KIK⁃net的CHBH06场地（Ⅲ类）中，将两种方法的计算结果与实际记录对比，结果表明：特征线法时程的傅里叶谱频带宽度与实际记录接近，加速度反应谱与实际记录的加速度反应谱较等效法加速度反应谱接近。通过对比分析，以期促进特征线差分方法的应用。

Abstract

This paper studied the difference between the results computed from the characteristic-difference method and the equivalent linear method for three typical models including Xiangtang， Yancheng and CHBH06 sites. As the input peak acceleration increased in the Xiangtang site （class Ⅱ）， the PGA（peak ground acceleration） calculated by the characteristic-difference method became larger gradually， while the PGA by the equivalent linear method decreased firstly and then increased. The response spectrum curves rose regularly for the characteristic-difference method， but didn’t increase till the input excitation was large enough for the equivalent linear method. In the Yancheng site （class Ⅳ）， the PGA of the characteristic-difference method was larger than that of the equivalent linear method， and the platform of the response spectrum was wider than the one of the equivalent linear method. By comparing the calculated results with the earthquake record in the KIK-net CHBH06 site （classⅢ）， the frequency band and response spectrum curve calculated by the characteristic-difference method were both closer to those of the actual record. The characteristic-difference method could be applied more widely through this analysis.

关键词

Keywords

references

Joyner W B ， Chen A T P . Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquake ［J］. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America ， 1975 ， 65 （ 5 ）： 1315 - 1321 .

Pyke R . Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings ［J］. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division ，American Society of Civil Engineering， 1979 ， 105 （ 6 ）： 715 - 726 .

王志良，韩清宇 . 粘弹塑性土层地震反应的波动分析法［J］. 地震工程与工程振动， 1981 ， 1 （ 1 ）： 116 - 137 .

Wang Zh L ， Han Q Y . Analysis of wave propagation for the site seismic response， using the visco-elastoplastic model ［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration ， 1981 ， 1 （ 1 ）： 116 - 137 . （in Chinese）

李小军 . 非线性土层地震反应分析的一种方法［J］. 华南地震， 1992 ， 12 （ 4 ）： 1 - 8 .

Li X J . A method to analyzing seismic response of nonlinear soil layers ［J］. South China Journal of Seismology ， 1992 ， 12 （ 4 ）： 1 - 8 . （in Chinese）

袁晓铭，李瑞山，孙锐 . 新一代土层地震反应分析方法研究［J］. 土木工程学报， 2016 ， 49 （ 10 ）： 95 - 102 .

Yuan X M ， Li R Sh ， Sun R . A new generation method for earthquake response analysis of soil layers ［J］. China Civil Engineering Journal ， 2016 ， 49 （ 10 ）： 95 - 102 . （in Chinese）

杨洋，孙锐，杨洪搏，等 . 国际上两种典型土层地震反应分析程序对比研究［J］. 世界地震工程， 2017 ， 33 （ 3 ）： 17 - 23 .

Yang Y ， Sun R ， Yang H B ， et al . Contrasting study between two international typical soil layers response analysis programs ［J］. World Earthquake Engineering ， 2017 ， 33 （ 3 ）： 17 - 23 . （in Chinese）

王鸾，袁近远，汪云龙，等 . 硬场地实测记录下几种土层地震反应分析程序可靠性对比［J］. 世界地震工程， 2018 ， 34 （ 3 ）： 161 - 168 .

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰