

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
为研究山岭隧道洞口段在地震动力作用下对边坡变形特征及其二者之间的相互影响,以宝兰客专某黄土隧道为工程背景,开展了大比例尺的黄土隧道洞口段大型振动台模型试验,输入不同类型的地震动参数,分析在地震动力作用下黄土隧道洞口段的动力响应及变形破坏特征。结果表明:(1)随着地震动强度的增大,模型表观和内部经历了弹性阶段、弹塑性阶段和破坏阶段;(2)阿里亚斯强度(Arias Intensity)的水平与垂直分量的放大系数云图呈现颜色区域互补状态,能量衰减区集中在洞口拱顶附近的围岩,仰拱底部 1~4.50 倍洞径和拱顶 2.50~4 倍洞径围岩范围则为能量加强区;(3)不同地震波形、相同加载方向,加速度水平、垂直分量的峰值连线线形相似,个别测点的加速度峰值突出到线形之外,峰值出现时刻明显提前或滞后,说明围岩发生较大的塑性变形或破坏;(4)单向加载时,拱顶、仰拱底部围岩沿隧道进深方向的加速度放大效应基本一样,沿垂直方向的放大系数连线的台阶式变化更为明显。双向耦合加载时,拱顶、仰拱底部围岩的放大系数连线的台阶式变化都较为明显。
In order to study the slope deformation characteristics and mutual influence between the en- trance section of the mountain tunnel under the action of seismic dynamics, a large-scale shaking table model test was conducted with a loess tunnel of Bao-Lan passenger dedicated line as the engineering background. During the test, seismic waves of different waveforms, loading directions and peak ground accelerations were applied to study the dynamic response, deformation, and failure characteris- tics of the loess tunnel and slope system. The test results indicated that:(1) with the increase of seis- mic intensity, the apparent and internal longitudinal sections of the model have experienced the elastic stage, elastic-plastic stage, and failure stage.(2) The contour lines of horizontal and vertical compo- nents of the Arias Intensity showed a complementary trend in colors. The local energy degradation ar- ea was mainly concentrated in the surrounding rocks near the arch of the portal, while the energy con- centration area was mainly distributed beneath the inverted arch about 1~4.50 times of the tunnel radi- us and above the vault about 2.50~4.50 times of the tunnel radius.(3) With different seismic wave- forms and the same loading direction, the peak value line of horizontal and vertical components of ac- celeration was similar. However, the peak values of acceleration of some measuring points protruded out of the line, and the peak value appeared obviously in advance or lag, indicating that the surround- ing rock experienced large plastic deformation or failure.(4) Under unidirectional loading, the acceler- ation amplification effect of the surrounding rock at the top and bottom of the invert was basically the same along the tunnel deepening direction. The step change along the vertical amplification coefficient line was more obvious. When the two-way coupling loading was applied, the step-by-step variation of the amplification coefficient of the surrounding rock at the top and bottom of the arch was obvious.
李天斌.汶川特大地震中山岭隧道变形破坏特征及影响因素分析[J].工程地质学报,2008,16(6):742-750.Li T b.Failure characteristics and influencing factorAnalysis of mountain tunnels at epicenter zones of greatWenchuan earthquake[J].Journal of Engineering Geol?ogy,2008,16(6):742-750.(in Chinese)
高波,王峥峥,袁松,等.汶川地震公路隧道震害启示[J].西南交通大学学报,2009,44(3):336-341,374.Gao B,Wang Z Z,Yuan S,et al.Lessons learnt fromdamage of highway tunnels in Wenchuan earthquake[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2009,44(3):336-341,374.(in Chinese)
郑清,高波,申玉生.山岭隧道震害调查及修复技术研究[J].石家庄铁道大学学报(自然科学版),2010,23(4):46-48,52.Zheng Q,Gao B,Shen Y S.Research on seismic dam?age investigation and repair technology of mountain tun?nel[J].Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University(Nat?ural Science),2010,23(4):46-48,52.(in Chinese)
李廷春,殷允腾.汶川地震中隧道结构的震害分析[J].工程爆破,2011,17(1):24-27.Li T C,Yin Y T.Seismic damage analysis of tunnelstructure in Wenchuan earthquake [J].EngineeringBlasting,2011,17(1):24-27.(in Chinese)
徐舜华,吴志坚,孙军杰,等.岷县漳县 6.6 级地震典型滑坡特征及其诱发机制[J].地震工程学报,2013,35(3):471-476.Xu S H,Wu Z J,Sun J J,et al.Study of the character?istics and inducing mechanism of typical earthquakelandslides of the Minxian-Zhangxian Ms6.6 earthquake[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2013,35(3):471-476.(in Chinese)
张建强,苏凤环,范建容“.4·20”芦山地震崩塌滑坡与公路危险性评价—以宝兴县省道S210沿线为例[J].山地学报,2013,31(5):616-623.Zheng J Q,Su F H,Fan J R."4·20" Lushan earth?quake landslide and highway risk assessment—a casestudy of Baoxing county provincial highway S210[J].Mountain Research,2013,31(5):616-623.(in Chi?nese)
邓园浩,程惠红,张贝,等.历史大地震断层滑动模型的建立及其对同震数值计算的影响—以1920年宁夏海原 Ms8.5 大地震为例[J].地球物理学报,2018,61(3):975-987.Deng Y H,Cheng H H,Zhang B,et al.Establishmentof the fault slip model for large historical earthquakesand its influence on co-seismic calculations:an exampleof the Ms8.5 Haiyuan earthquake in 1920[J].ChineseJournal of Geophysics,2018,61(3):975-987.(in Chi?nese)
郭增建,郭安宁,张向红,等.纪念古浪8级大震九十周年 — 暨对特大地震的研究讨论[J].地震工程学报,2017,39(2):191-195.Guo Z J,Guo A N,Zhang X H,et al.Commemora?tion of the ninetieth anniversary of the Gulang Ms8earthquake—discussion of the study of great earthquakes[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2017,39(2):191-195.(in Chinese)
谢虹,袁道阳,雷中生,等.1927 年古浪8级地震的震灾特征与启示[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2014,50(5):622-627.Xie H,Yuan D Y,Lei Z S,et al.Seismic hazard char?acteristics of and lessons from Gulang Ms8 earthquakein 1927[J].Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sci?ences),2014,50(5):622-627.(in Chinese)
Bouckovalas G D,Papadimitriou A G.Numerical eval?uation of slope topography effects on seismic ground mo?tion[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2004,25(7):547-558.
祁生文.单面边坡的两种动力反应形式及其临界高度[J].地球物理学报,2006,49(2):518-523.Qi S W.Two patterns of dynamic responses of singlefree-surface slopes and their threshold height[J].Chi?nese Journal of Geophysics,2006,49(2):518-523.(inChinese)
张晋东,梁庆国,蒲建军,等.不同进洞高程黄土隧道洞口段振动台模型试验研究[J].公路交通科技,2018,35(7):81-89.Zhang J D,Liang Q G,Pu J J,et al.Experimentalstudy on shaking table model of portal section of loesstunnel with different tunneling elevations[J].Journal ofHighway and Transportation Research and Develop?ment,2018,35(7):81-89.(in Chinese)
房军,梁庆国,张钦鹏,等.考虑边坡进洞高程的黄土隧道洞口段动力响应数值模拟[J].地震工程与工程振动,2018,38(3):152-161.Fang J,Liang Q G,Zhang Q P,et al.Numerical simu?lation of dynamic responses of loess tunnel portal sec?tion with the consideration of tunneling elevation on theslope[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dy?namics,2018,38(3):152-161(.in Chinese)
许强,刘汉香,邹威,等.斜坡加速度动力响应特性的大型振动台试验研究[J].岩土力学与工程学报,2010,29(12):2420-2428.Xu Q,Liu H X,Zou W,et al.Large-scale shaking ta?ble test study of accelertion dynamic responses charac?teristics of slopes[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechan?ics and Engineering,2010,29(12):2420-2428.(inChinese)
蒋树屏,文栋良,郑升宝.嘎隆拉隧道洞口段地震响应大型振动台模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(4):649-656.Jiang S P,Wen D L,Zheng S B.Large-scale shakingtable test for seismic response in portal section ofGaLongLa tunnel[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2011,30(4):649-656.(inChinese)
Xu H,Li T B,Xia L,et al.Shaking table tests on seis?mic measures of a model mountain tunnel[J].Tunnel?ling and Underground Space Technology,2016,60:197-209.
Xin C L,Wang Z Z,Gao B,et al.Shaking table testson seismic response and damage mode of tunnel liningsin diverse tunnel-void interaction states[J].Tunnellingand Underground Space Technology,2018,77:295-304.
王猛,梁庆国,王丽丽,等.黄土隧道边仰坡动力响应的大型振动台模型试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2019,39(2):141-150.Wang M,Liang Q G,Wang L L,et al.Large scaleshaking table model test study on dynamic response ofside and front slopes of loess tunnel[J].Earthquake En?gineering and Engineering Vibration,2019,39(2):141-150(in Chinese)
铁路工程抗震设计规范:GB50111—2006[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2006.
建筑抗震设计规范:GB50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
ARIAS A.A measure of earthquake intensity,in seis?mic design for nuclear power plants[R].Cambridge:MIT Press,1970.
袁松.地震动力响应下公路隧道合理净距的研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2008.Yuan S.Research on reasonable clear distance of high?way tunnel under seismic dynamic response[D].Cheng?du:Southwest Jiaotong University,2008.(in Chinese)
0
Views
364
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
苏公网安备32010202012147号