Earthquakes are one of the main causes of damage to the integrated pipe gallery. Once the integrated pipe gallery is damaged, the consequences will be much more complex than the traditional buried pipeline. In this paper, several common joint forms of integrated pipe gallery are introduced, finite element models are established for different joint forms, the standard section of the integrated pipe gallery is selected, the concrete plastic damage model and soil constitutive model are considered, and the seismic response analysis of the pipe gallery with different joint forms and the internal pipelines is analyzed by applying viscoelastic artificial boundary and equivalent nodal force by the self-programmed program. The results show that the response of the monolithic cast-in-situ structure is higher than that of the prefabricated assembled structure for the maximum longitudinal displacement difference under different ground motion intensities, and the response difference will further increase with the increase of ground motion intensity. Under the two joint forms, the damage of the standard section of the pipe gallery under the seismic action is very small, and only minor damage will occur when the peak acceleration of ground motion reaches 0.4g and above, which will not affect its serviceability states. Under the same seismic action, the pipe stress level of the small diameter pipe will be smaller than that of the large diameter pipe. The joint form of combining a rubber water stop belt with a prestressed steel bar at the same time will be more conducive to reducing the stress level of the pipeline in the corridor than the joint form of only a rubber water stop belt. Considering that the prefabricated assembled structure connected by prestressed steel bars will further improve the safety level of the pipelines in the corridor, therefore, when the cost permits, not only the waterproofing of the joints should be considered, but also the adjacent sections should be connected with prestressed ribs to further improve the seismic performance of the integrated pipe gallery.
关键词
Keywords
references
Bai Y,Zhou R,Wu J.Hazard identification and analy?sis of urban utility tunnels in China[J].Tunnelling andUnderground Space Technology,2020,106(12):103584.1?103584.12.
陈国兴,陈苏,杜修力,等.城市地下结构抗震研究进展[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2016,36(1):1-23.Chen G X,Chen S,Du X L,et al.Review of seismicdamage,model test,available design and analysis meth?ods of urban underground structures:retrospect andprospect[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitiga?tion Engineering,2016,36(1):1-23.(in Chinese)
郭恩栋,王鹏宇,刘述虹,等.典型综合管廊体系的地震响应分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2018,38(1):124-134.Guo E D,Wang P Y,Liu S H,et al.Seismic responseanalysis of typical utility tunnel system[J].EarthquakeEngineering and Engineering Dynamics,2018,38(1):124-134.(in Chinese)
谷音,邱诗榕,熊梦婷,等.预制综合管廊-接头-场地土地震响应分析[J].建筑结构,2022,52(3):57-66.Gu Y,Qiu S R,Xiong M T,et al.Seismic responseanalysis of prefabricated comprehensive pipe galleryjoint-site soil[J].Building Structure,2022,52(3):57-66.(in Chinese)
王鹏宇,王述红,朱承金.城市地下管廊结构地震动力响应分析[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(7):1020-1027.Wang P Y,Wang S H,Zhu C J.Seismic dynamic re?sponse analysis of urban underground utility tunnelstructure[J].Journal of Northeastern University(Natu?ral Science),2019,40(7):1020-1027.(in Chinese)
仉文岗,韩亮,陈志雄,等.双仓综合管廊抗震性能模型试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2020,42(1):100-108.Zhang W G,Han L,Chen Z X,et.Model tests on seis?mic performance of double-box underground utility tun?nel[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2020,42(1):100-108.(in Chinese)
Wei L,Song Z Y,Wang Y C.Seismic analysis of theconnections of buried segmented pipes[J].ComputerModeling in Engineering&Sciences,2020,123(1):257-282.
Zhao W S,Chen W Z.Effect of near-fault ground mo?tions with long-period pulses on the tunnel[J].Journalof Vibroengineering.2015,17(2):841-858.
Liu W,Wu Q.Comparison between the seismic perfor?mance of buried pipes and pipes in a utility tunnel[J].Computer Modeling in Engineering \& Sciences,2020,123(2):661-690.
Lee J,Fenves G L.Plastic-damage model for cyclicloading of concrete structures[J].Journal of EngineeringMechanics,1998,124(8):892-900.
Kiyomiya O.Earthquake-resistant design features of im?mersed tunnels in Japan[J].Tunnelling and Under?ground Space Technology,1995,10(4):463-475.
Anastasopoulos I,Gerolymos N,Drosos V,et al.Nonlinear response of deep immersed tunnel to strongseismic shaking[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoen?vironmental Engineering,2007,133(9):1067-1090.
陈磊,陈国兴,李丽梅.近场和远场地震动作用下双层竖向重叠地铁隧道地震反应特性[J].中国铁道科学,2010,31(1):79-85.Chen L,Chen G X,Li L M.Seismic response character?istics of double-layer vertical overlapping subway tunnelsunder the vibration of near-field and far-field sites[J].Chi?na Railway Science,2010,31(1):79-85(.in Chinese)
Cui Z,Sheng Q,Leng X.Effects of a controlling geo?logical discontinuity on the seismic stability of an under?ground cavern subjected to near-fault ground motions[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology & the Environ?ment,2018,77(1):265?282.
寇有振.预制预应力综合管廊受力性能研究[D].西安:长安大学,2018.Kou Y Z.Study on mechanical performance of precastprestressed utility tunnel[D].Xi'an:Chang'an Universi?ty,2018.(in Chinese)