Analysis on Damage Characteristics of Single-bay Street Farmhouses in Lushan Earthquake

Zhu Zhanyuan

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Analysis on Damage Characteristics of Single-bay Street Farmhouses in Lushan Earthquake

更新时间：2025-09-25

- Analysis on Damage Characteristics of Single-bay Street Farmhouses in Lushan Earthquake
- Issue 2, Pages: 203-210(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  四川农业大学土木工程学院,四川都江堰,611830
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC： TU362
- Published：2021
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱占元,陈婷婷,邹祖银,阙明阳.芦山地震单开间砌体结构房屋震害特征∗[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2021,(2):203-210

Zhu Zhanyuan. Analysis on Damage Characteristics of Single-bay Street Farmhouses in Lushan Earthquake[J]. 2021, (2): 203-210.
朱占元,陈婷婷,邹祖银,阙明阳.芦山地震单开间砌体结构房屋震害特征∗[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2021,(2):203-210 DOI：

Zhu Zhanyuan. Analysis on Damage Characteristics of Single-bay Street Farmhouses in Lushan Earthquake[J]. 2021, (2): 203-210. DOI：

摘要

4.20 芦山地震灾区临街自建单开间砌体结构房屋震害特别严重，本文基于现场调查研究该类特殊房屋的建造习惯、震害特征与损伤机理，研究表明：单开间砌体房屋是芦山地震灾区等四川小城镇比较常见的临街建筑模式，其平面狭长，建造随意，结构体系不合理，构造措施不到位，抗震能力弱；芦山地震地震烈度 8、9 度灾区单开间砌体房屋底层纵墙剪切破坏，普遍出现严重的贯通整片墙体的斜裂缝或 X 形裂缝。底层前部房间横墙无纵向支撑，独立墙段过长，横墙压弯破坏出现贯通整片墙体的水平裂缝，并且墙体外鼓；结构刚度中心与质量中心严重偏离，房屋扭转震动加剧墙体裂缝开展，相邻建筑反复碰撞作用是上部楼层震害的主要原因；鞭梢效应加重突变楼层结构损伤，引起出屋面附属建筑严重破坏甚至倒塌，横墙端部剪切断裂乃至溃散。据此，提出了既有单开间砌体房屋加固工作的建议。

Abstract

The damage of single-bay street farmhouses built with masonry is especially heavy during Lushan earthquake disaster. Based on field investigation，this paper studies the construction habit and earthquake damage characteristics of this type of special buildings. The research shows that the construction of single-bay masonry houses is relatively common in Lushan earthquake-stricken area and other small cities in Sichuan. The unreasonable house length，arbitrary construction，chaotic structural system and the absence of constructional measures should be responsible for the weakness of earthquake-resistant capacity of the house. The shear failure at the bottom of the longitudinal wall of singlebay houses results in oblique cracks or X-shaped cracks that cut through the entire wall in the areas with earthquake intensity between 8 and 9. The cross wall of the ground floor is relatively long without longitudinal support，which leads to the cross wall cracks and protrudes outward due to press-bend failure. Structural stiffness center and mass center deviate seriously，hence the effect of torsion and vibration aggravates the development of wall cracks. The repeated collision of adjacent buildings is the main cause for the damage of the upper floor. The whiplash effect aggravates the damage of the floor structure，causing the upper accessory structure severe damage or even collapse. Besides，the end of the cross wall suffers fracture or collapse for the shear failure. Accordingly，suggestions for strengthening existing single story masonry buildings are put forward.

关键词

Keywords

references

陆鸣,邢珏蕙,喻畑,等.非正规设计施工建筑及芦山 7.0 级地震震害调查[J].地震工程与工程振动,2013,33(6):131-137.Lu M,Xing J H,Yu T,et al.The investigation and analysis on the damage of non-engineered buildings in Lushan earthquake with Ms 7.0[J].Journal of Earth? quake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2013,33(6):131-137.(in Chinese)

周铁钢,钱相博,张冰冰.芦山地震农村房屋震害调查与分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2013,33(3):53-58.Zhou T G,Qian X B,Zhang B B.Investigation and analysis of damage to rural houses in Lushan earthquake [J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2013,33(3):53-58.(in Chinese)

潘毅,王忠凯,时胜杰,等.尼泊尔 8.1 级地震加德满都—樟木沿线居民震害调查与分析[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,44(3):35-44.Pan Y,Wang Zh K,Shi Sh J,et al.Investigation and analysis on seismic damage of residential buildings along the highway from Kathmandu to Zhangmu in Ms 8.1 Gorkha Earthquake[J].Journal of Hunan Universi? ty(Natural Sciences),2017,44(3):35-44.(in Chi? nese)

Sharma K,Deng L,Noguez C C.Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the April 25,2015,Gorkha earthquake in Nepal[J].Engi? neering Structures,2016,121:61-74.

Pan Y,Wang X,Guo R,et al.Seismic damage assess? ment of Nepalese cultural heritage building and seismic retrofit strategies:25 April 2015 Gorkha(Nepal)earth? quake [J].Engineering Failure Analysis,2018,87:80-95.

Villar-vega M,Silva V.Assessment of earthquake dam? age considering the characteristics of past events in South America[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake En? gineering,2017,99:86-96.

Lang D H,Kumar A,Sulaymanov S,et al.Building typology classification and earthquake vulnerability scale of Central and South Asian building stock [J].Journal of Building Engineering,2017,15:261-277.

Bayraktar A,Co?kun N,Yal?in A.Damages of mason? ry buildings during the July 2,2004 Do?ubayaz?t(A?r?)earthquake in Turkey[J].Engineering Failure Analysis,2007,14(1):147-157.

Sorrentino L,Cattari S,Porto F D,et al.Seismic be? haviour of ordinary masonry buildings during the 2016 central Italy earthquakes[J].Bulletin of Earthquake En? gineering,2019,17(10):5583?5607.

谭皓,张电吉.芦山地震底部框架砌体房屋震害分析 [J].世界地震工程,2015,31(1):76-81.Tan H,Zhang D J.Seismic damage analysis of mason? ry structures with ground RC frame building during Lushan earthquake [J].World Earthquake Engineer? ing,2015,31(1):76-81.(in Chinese)

谭皓,卢海林,吴巧云,等.芦山地震砌体结构震害分析[J].世界地震工程,2016(1):59-64.Tan H,Lu H L,Wu Q Y,et al.Damage and analysis of masonry structure in Lushan earthquake[J].World Earthquake Engineering,2016(1):59-64.(in Chinese)

杨永强,公茂盛,谢礼立,等.芦山 M7.0 级地震中砖混结构民居震害特征分析[J].建筑结构,2014,44(18):68-70.Yang Y Q,Gong M Sh,Xie L L,et al.Analysis on seismic damage characteristics of masonry-concrete structure dwellings in Lushan M7.0 earthquake [J].Building Structure,2014,44(18):68-70.(in Chinese)

魏智辉,潘毅,邱洪兴,等.勾缝加固砖砌体墙的抗压性能试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2017,49(12):184-188.Wei Zh H,Pan Y,Qiu H X,et al.Experimental study on compressive behavior of masonry walls strengthened withh pointing mortar[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2017,49(12):184-188.(in Chinese)

赵世春,潘毅,高永昭,等《.四川省建筑抗震鉴定与加固技术规程》编制要点[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2010,32(增 2):310-311.Zhao S C,Pan Y,Gao Z Y,et al.The key point of Technical specification for seismic appraisal and rein? forcement of buildings in Sichuan[J].Journal of civil Architectural & Environmental Engineering,2010,32(Sup 2):310-311.(in Chinese)

陈婷婷.自建无构造柱单开间农房振动台试验与有限元分析[D].成都:四川农业大学,2018.Chen T T.The unstructured column single-bay street farmhouse of shaking table test and finite element analy? sis [D].Chendu:Sichuan Agricultural University,2018.(in Chinese)

Views

420

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Study on Influence of Ground Motion Duration on Seismic Response of Masonry Structures

Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of Masonry Structure with Large Openings at the Bottom Floor of Reinforced Concrete Walls

Simulation and Mechanism Analysis of Seismic Damage to Urban Buildings Groups during the M_s 6.0 Luxian Earthquake

Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of Masonry Walls with Different Height‑Width Ratio Strengthened by HFMRPC

Vulnerability Analysis of Masonry Structure Considering the Action of Rotational Component of Ground Motion

Related Author

ZUO Zhanxuan

GONG Maosheng

XIE Guoxiong

ZHAO Kaozhong

LIU Zheng

ZHANG Qian

REN Pengfei

WEI Ruixiang

Related Institution

Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration

Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Ministry of Emergency Management

School of Civil Engineering , Shandong Jianzhu University

Key Lab of Building Structural Retrofitting and Underground Space Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Shandong Jianzhu University

Engineering Research Institute of Appraisal and Strengthening of Shandong Jianzhu University Co., Ltd

⁰