1.陕西省延安公路管理局,陕西 延安 716000
2.西安科技大学建筑与土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710054
3.西安科技大学道路工程研究中心,陕西 西安 710054
4.陕西科技控股集团有限责任公司,陕西 西安 710003
高海军(1976—),男,高级工程师。主要从事公路工程科研及管理工作。E-mail:318609187@qq.com
纸质出版:2022-02-28
移动端阅览
高海军,董丁明,赵琪等.循环荷载作用下加筋土路基动力响应研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2022,42(01):208-215.
GAO Haijun,DONG Dingming,ZHAO Qi,et al.Study on Dynamic Response of Reinforced Soil Subgrade under Cyclic Loading[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2022,42(01):208-215.
高海军,董丁明,赵琪等.循环荷载作用下加筋土路基动力响应研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2022,42(01):208-215. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.201910031.
GAO Haijun,DONG Dingming,ZHAO Qi,et al.Study on Dynamic Response of Reinforced Soil Subgrade under Cyclic Loading[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2022,42(01):208-215. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.201910031.
为明确模块面板式加筋土路基在顶面循环荷载作用下的受力变形规律与机制,以延安市某加筋土路基工程为背景,开展动三轴试验,关注不同荷载强度下试样动应力、动应变等多项指标的演化趋势,同时搭建加筋土路基数值模型并完成计算,明确路基水平沉降与面板侧向位移的潜在规律,进而探讨循环荷载作用下加筋土路基工程的动力响应机制。认知如下:在循环荷载的参与下,累积轴向塑性应变随加载次数的增加呈增长趋势,即先快速增大,随后趋缓,最后稳定;塑性应变曲线形态不一,呈“宽胖型”与“陡峻型”并存的态势;
<math id="M1"><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi></math>
http://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=25548512&type=
http://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=25548510&type=
14.05466747
2.45533323
模型和改进
<math id="M2"><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi></math>
http://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=25548512&type=
http://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=25548510&type=
14.05466747
2.45533323
模型均可较好表达累积轴向塑性应变与循环次数的内在联系,但改进
<math id="M3"><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi></math>
http://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=25548512&type=
http://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=25548510&type=
14.05466747
2.45533323
模型更为理想,动应力幅值越大,试样变形稳定所需加载次数越多;路基沉降和面板水平变形随着荷载强度的增加而增大,但所据位置较为稳定,其中峰值路基沉降始终处于载荷外侧处,峰值水平变形则位于0.36~0.43 h区间。
To clarify the law and mechanism of the deformation of the modular panel reinforced soil subgrade under the top surface cyclic load, a dynamic triaxial test was carried out with a reinforced soil subgrade project in Yan'an as the background. The evolution trend of various indicators such as stress, dynamic strain, is investigated. At the same time, a numerical model of reinforced soil roadbed is set up and calculations are performed. The potential laws of horizontal settlement of the roadbed and lateral displacement of the slab are clarified. Response mechanism. The cognition is as follows: With the participation of cyclic loads, the cumulative axial plastic strain increases with the increase of the number of loadings, that is, it increases rapidly first, then slows down, and finally stabilizes. The shape of the plastic strain curve is different, showing the tendency of "broad fat" and "steep" coexisting; both the model and the improved model can better express the internal relationship between the cumulative axial plastic strain and the number of cycles, but the improved model is more ideal. The larger the magnitude of the dynamic stress, the more times the sample needs to be stabilized for deformation. The settlement of the subgrade and the horizontal deformation of the slab increase with the increase of the load intensity, but the location is more stable. The peak subgrade settlement is always outside the load. The peak horizontal deformation is in the range of 0.36h ~ 0.43h. The study provides a useful reference for scientific operation and preventive maintenance of reinforced earth roadbed engineering in mountainous areas.
Vidal H . The principle of reinforced earth [R]. Washington D C : Highway Research Board,National Research Council , 1969 .
雷胜友 . 加筋黄土的三轴试验研究 [J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版) , 2000 , 20 ( 2 ): 1 - 5 .
Lei S Y . Study on reinforced loess by triaxial tests [J]. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition) , 2000 , 20 ( 2 ): 1 - 5 . (in Chinese)
王钊 , 王协群 . 加筋地基的极限分析 [J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版) , 2001 , 41 ( 6 ): 112 - 114 .
Wang Z , Wang X Q . Limit analysis for reinforced foundations [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) , 2001 , 41 ( 6 ): 112 - 114 . (in Chinese)
李婷 , 苏谦 , 刘宝 , 等 . 加筋土挡墙水平位移解析计算与参数分析 [J]. 中国公路学报 , 2019 , 32 ( 5 ): 47 - 56 .
Li T , Su Q , Liu B , et al . Analytical calculation and parametric analysis of lateral displacement of reinforced soil retaining walls [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport , 2019 , 32 ( 5 ): 47 - 56 . (in Chinese)
徐超 , 赵春风 , 叶观宝 . 关于土与土工合成材料界面的试验研究 [J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版) , 2004 , 32 ( 3 ): 307 - 311 .
Xu C , Zhao C F , Ye G B . Research on interface between soil and geosynthetics [J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science) , 2004 , 32 ( 3 ): 307 - 311 . (in Chinese)
Li J , Ding D W . Nonlinear elastic behavior of fiber-reinforced soil under cyclic loading [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 2002 , 22 ( 9 ): 977 - 983 .
杨敏 , 李宁 , 刘新星 , 等 . 土工布加筋土界面摩擦特性试验研究 [J]. 西安理工大学学报 , 2016 , 32 ( 1 ): 46 - 51 .
Yang M , Li N , Liu X X , et al . Experimental research on interface frictional behaviors of the geotextile-reinforced soil [J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Technology , 2016 , 32 ( 1 ): 46 - 51 . (in Chinese)
苏立海 , 李宁 , 朱才辉 . 土工布加筋土的三轴蠕变试验研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报 , 2016 , 35 ( 6 ): 1273 - 1280 .
Su L H , Li N , Zhu C H . Triaxial creep tests on geotextile reinforced soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering , 2016 , 35 ( 6 ): 1273 - 1280 . (in Chinese)
刘宽 , 叶万军 , 景宏君 , 等 . 季冻区黄土微观损伤识别与宏观力学响应研究 [J]. 岩土工程学报 , 2021 , 43 ( 增1 ): 192 - 197 .
Liu K , Ye W J , Jing H J , et al . Microscopic damage identification and macroscopic mechanical response of loess in seasonal frozen areas [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 2021 , 43 ( Sup1 ): 192 - 197 . (in Chinese)
刘宽 , 叶万军 , 高海军 , 等 . 干湿环境下膨胀土力学性能劣化的多尺度效应 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报 , 2020 , 39 ( 10 ): 2148 - 2159 .
Liu K , Ye W J , Gao H J , et al . Multi-scale effects of mechanical property degradation of expansive soils under drying-wetting environments [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering , 2020 , 39 ( 10 ): 2148 - 2159 . (in Chinese)
Liu K , Hu W P , Gao C , et al . Energy dissipation of an infinite damping beam supported by saturated poroelastic halfspace [J]. Physica Scripta , 2021 , 96 ( 5 ): 055220 .
Suzuki M , Nakashita A , Tsukuda K , et al . Applicability of clinker ash as fill material in steel strip-reinforced soil walls [J]. Soils and Foundations , 2018 , 58 : 16 - 33 .
Wang H , Yang G , Wang Z , et al . Static structural behavior of geogrid reinforced soil retaining walls with a deformation buffer zone [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 2020 , 48 ( 3 ): 374 - 379 .
Liu K , Ye W J , Jing H J . Shear strength and damage characteristics of compacted expansive soil subjected to wet-dry cycles: a multi-scale study [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences , 2021 , 14 : 2866 .
Shinde A L , Mandal J N . Behavior of reinforced soil retaining wall with limited fill zone parameter [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering , 2007 , 25 ( 6 ): 657 - 672 .
Wu J T , Wang K H , MHesham E L . Naggar dynamic soil reactions around pile-fictitious soil pile coupled model and itsapplication in parallel seismic method [J]. Computers and Geotechnics , 2019 , 110 : 44 - 56 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
苏公网安备32010202012147号
