纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
[1]孙立娟,杨涛,王泽华,康健.基于可滑性分析的土质边坡局部稳定性研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2019,39(01):147-152.
孙立娟, 杨涛, 王泽华, et al. Study on the Local Stability of Soil Slope based on the Slipforming Property[J]. 2019, 39(1): 147-152.
[1]孙立娟,杨涛,王泽华,康健.基于可滑性分析的土质边坡局部稳定性研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2019,39(01):147-152. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2019.01.020.
孙立娟, 杨涛, 王泽华, et al. Study on the Local Stability of Soil Slope based on the Slipforming Property[J]. 2019, 39(1): 147-152. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2019.01.020.
传统的局部安全系数计算方法通常是基于某种屈服准则
通过判断坡体内部是否发生塑性屈服来评价边坡局部稳定性。实际上
发生塑性屈服的区域通常远大于滑动面的范围
仅以是否发生塑性屈服作为局部稳定性评价指标偏于保守
为此进行坡体可滑性分析
即考虑坡体内各点具有的形成滑动面的可能性
并定义该指标为滑动因子。同时
将坡体内各点的塑性屈服程度用剪切塑性屈服系数来表示。将两者结合起来共同评价坡体的局部稳定性。研究表明
边坡局部稳定性不仅与坡体内各点沿潜在滑动面的屈服程度有关
还取决于该点形成滑动面的可能性
可表达为剪切塑性屈服系数与滑动因子的乘积。用ACADS边坡考题验证了本文方法的正确性
为边坡稳定性分析提供了思路。
The traditional calculation method of local safety factor is usually based on some yield criterion
which is used to evaluate the local stability of the slope by judging whether the slope body undergo plastic yielding or not.In fact
the plastic yield area is usually much larger than the range of sliding surface
so it is conservative to take the plastic yield as the local stability evaluation index.For this reason
the whole slipforming property analysis of the slope is put forward
that is
the fixed point method is used to describe the possibility of forming the whole sliding surface with the points in the slope
and the index is defined as the whole sliding factor.In the meantime
the plastic yield level of each point in the slope is expressed by the shear plastic yield coefficient.The two factors are combined to evaluate the local stability of the slope.The results show that the local safety factor is related not only to the current stress state
but also to the possibility of forming the whole sliding surface
which can be expressed as the product of the shear plastic yield coefficient and the sliding factor.In this paper
we use the ACADs referenced slope example to verify the correctness of the calculation method
which provides a new idea for slope stability analysis.
基于黏聚区域模型的边坡渐进破坏过程强化有限元分析 [J]. 凌道盛,涂福彬,卜令方. 岩土工程学报 . 2012(08)
基于FLAC 3D 的强度折减法和点安全系数法对比 [J]. 郑文棠. 水利与建筑工程学报 . 2010(04)
岩土材料剪切破坏点安全系数的研究 [J]. 樊赟赟,王思敬,王恩志,刘晓丽. 岩土力学 . 2009(S2)
地震边坡破坏机制及其破裂面的分析探讨 [J]. 郑颖人,叶海林,黄润秋. 岩石力学与工程学报 . 2009(08)
江坪河水电站溢洪洞围岩稳定性仿真分析 [J]. 吴家冠,段亚辉. 岩土力学 . 2009(08)
Seismic failure mechanisms for loaded slopes with associated and nonassociated flow rules [J]. 杨小礼,眭志荣. Journal of Central South University of Technology . 2008(02)
位移突变判据中监测点的位置和位移方式分析 [J]. 林杭,曹平,宫凤强. 岩土工程学报 . 2007(09)
三维抗滑稳定分析中的点安全系数法 [J]. 沈可,张仲卿. 人民珠江 . 2003(02)
边坡的渐进破坏及稳定性分析 [J]. 王庚荪. 岩石力学与工程学报 . 2000(01)
工程高边坡病害空间预测理论及其应用 [D]. 杨涛. 西南交通大学 2006
土质边坡稳定分析[M]. 中国水利水电出版社 , 陈祖煜, 2002
拱坝坝肩岩体稳定分析[M]. 贵州人民出版社 , 王毓泰等 编, 1982
Force analysis of pile foundation in rock slope based on upper-bound theorem of limit [J] . Ming-hua Zhao,Jian-hua Liu,Dai-quan Liu,You Wang. Journal of Central South University of Technology . 2008 (3)
Influences of nonassociated flow rules on seismic bearing capacity factors of strip footing on soil slope by energy dissipation method [J] . Xiao-li Yang,Nai-zheng Guo,Lian-heng Zhao,Jin-feng Zou. Journal of Central South University of Technology . 2007 (6)
0
浏览量
137
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
苏公网安备32010202012147号
