纸质出版:2019
移动端阅览
[1]孙昊,赵万玉,游勇,陈晓清,陈剑刚.梯-潭结构型泥石流排导槽消能特征试验研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2019,39(01):132-140.
孙昊, 赵万玉, 游勇, et al. Experimental Study on Energy Dissipation Characteristics of Debris Flow in a Drainage Channel with Step-pool Configuration[J]. 2019, 39(1): 132-140.
[1]孙昊,赵万玉,游勇,陈晓清,陈剑刚.梯-潭结构型泥石流排导槽消能特征试验研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2019,39(01):132-140. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2019.01.018.
孙昊, 赵万玉, 游勇, et al. Experimental Study on Energy Dissipation Characteristics of Debris Flow in a Drainage Channel with Step-pool Configuration[J]. 2019, 39(1): 132-140. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2019.01.018.
梯-潭结构型排导槽是一种适用于大比降沟床条件下的泥石流排导工程措施
因其良好的防治功效和工程价值而具有较好的应用前景。选取泥石流容重、规模和潭深为主要影响因素
通过水槽试验模拟泥石流在梯-潭结构型排导槽中的运动过程。结果表明
潭内表层铺填的砾石在泥石流浆体强烈的紊动和大颗粒冲击碰撞下发生明显的物质交换现象
且排导过渡性泥石流时物质交换现象最为强烈
稀性泥石流次之
粘性泥石流则相对较弱;梯-潭结构型排导槽的消能主要体现在泥石流通过梯-潭结构时泥深变化和加剧紊流两个方面;梯-潭结构的消能效率与潭深呈正相关关系
且消能率基本大于20%
最大消能率可达73.93%。当潭深过大时
梯-潭结构对泥石流表现出明显的拦截作用
虽消能效果明显
但与排导宗旨相悖。而泥石流规模对梯-潭结构消能的影响相对较小
整体呈现规模越小消能率越高的趋势。
The drainage channel with step-pool configuration
which is one of debris flow drainage works and is used in gully with steep gradient
has a good potential application because of its high-performance control effect and engineering value.In order to explore the characteristics of debris flow in a drainage channel with step-pool configuration
debris flow bulk density
scale and depth of step-pool configuration are selected as the main affecting factors and a series of flume experiments are carried out.Debris flow pattern
time-averaged depth and a phenomenon of interchange of materials were investigated along with the characteristics of energy dissipation in this paper.According to the experimental results
the phenomenon was most intense when debris flow with 17 kN/m3 passed through a drainage channel than the other two.And the energy dissipation is mainly shown in the aspects of flow depth changing and turbulence intensifying.The analysis also indicates that the ratio of energy dissipation increased as depth of step-pool configuration increased and was more than 20% basically.The maximum observed ratio of energy dissipation was 73.93%in the experiment where debris flow bulk density was 14 kN/m3
scale was 0.5 m3 and depth of step-pool configuration was 30 cm.However
the step-pool configuration with overlarge depth performed evident trapping sediment which contraries the purpose of transporting sediment.Besides
the energy dissipation decreased with the debris flow scale
which had fewer effect than the other two factors.
Characteristics of viscous debris flow in a drainage channel with an energy dissipation structure [J]. CHEN Jian-gang,CHEN Xiao-qing,CHEN Hua-yong,ZHAO Wan-yu. Journal of Mountain Science . 2016(02)
Calculation of the ultimate depth of a scour pit after debris flow through drainage canal ribs [J]. LIU Shu-liang,YOU Yong,ZHANG Guang-ze,WANG Dong,ZHAO Hai-xin,SUN Hao. Journal of Mountain Science . 2016(02)
汶川震区狭陡型泥石流典型特征与防治 [J]. 杨东旭,游勇,陈晓清,赵万玉,石胜伟,谢忠胜. 水文地质工程地质 . 2015(01)
泥石流V型排导槽防淤设计方法及其应用研究 [J]. 韩征,徐林荣,苏志满,陈舒阳. 灾害学 . 2012(02)
泥石流排导槽研究进展及发展方向 [J]. 高全,陈晓清,赵万玉. 中国地质灾害与防治学报 . 2010(02)
泥石流V型排导槽计算方法 [J]. 孙晓勇,陈洪凯. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版) . 2010(01)
软基消能型泥石流排导槽的肋槛基础埋深计算 [J]. 陈晓清,李德基,崔鹏. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版) . 2009(10)
“东川型”排导槽结构对泥石流流速影响的实验研究 [J]. 黄海,马东涛,王显林. 山地学报 . 2009(05)
泥石流直墙V型排导槽横断面优化设计 [J]. 游勇,柳金峰. 山地学报 . 2008(02)
泥石流排导槽冲淤规律观察研究 [J]. 张开平,吕态能. 水土保持研究 . 2002(04)
两种主要泥石流排导槽的比较 [J]. 陈晓清,王士革,李德基,崔鹏. 灾害学 . 2001(03)
泥石流排导槽及其优化设计研究 [J]. 张开平. 中国地质灾害与防治学报 . 1997(04)
川藏公路泥石流灾害及其整治对策 [J]. 赵永国. 水土保持学报 . 1993(01)
泥石流防治指南[M]. 科学出版社 , 周必凡等编著, 1991
Experimental study on a debris-flow drainage channel with different types of energy dissipation baffles [J] . Fei Wang,Xiaoqing Chen,Jiangang Chen,Yong You. Engineering Geology . 2017
0
浏览量
105
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
苏公网安备32010202012147号
