统一模型下粘性土和砂性土液化特性数值研究

刘必劲; 张卫平

doi:10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2019.01.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

统一模型下粘性土和砂性土液化特性数值研究

论文 | 更新时间：2025-12-11

- 统一模型下粘性土和砂性土液化特性数值研究
- Numerical Liquefaction Study of Clayey and Sandy Soils in a Unified Constitutive Model
- 防灾减灾工程学报 2019年39卷第1期页码：75-81
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  福州市海洋经济创新发展示范工作项目（FJHJ16）资助
- DOI：10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2019.01.011
  中图分类号： U435
- 纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
[1]刘必劲,张卫平.统一模型下粘性土和砂性土液化特性数值研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2019,39(01):75-81.

刘必劲, 张卫平. Numerical Liquefaction Study of Clayey and Sandy Soils in a Unified Constitutive Model[J]. 2019, 39(1): 75-81.
[1]刘必劲,张卫平.统一模型下粘性土和砂性土液化特性数值研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2019,39(01):75-81. DOI： 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2019.01.011.

刘必劲, 张卫平. Numerical Liquefaction Study of Clayey and Sandy Soils in a Unified Constitutive Model[J]. 2019, 39(1): 75-81. DOI： 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2019.01.011.

摘要

考虑到土体介质材料经历弹性卸载后即进入超固结状态

而其反过来又能影响土体的力学与抗液化特性

通过考虑超固结因素的影响

在统一下负荷面剑桥模型下对砂性土与粘性土的力学与抗液化特性进行了数值试验对比研究。结果表明

与粘性土相比

砂性土在加载过程中表现出更高的非线性特征与可压缩性

且在非排水加载下更容易引发屈服和液化。通过考虑土体超固结因素的影响以及不同土体条件下超固结比演化规律的差异

下负荷面剑桥模型在统一理论框架下很好的模拟出了砂性土与粘性土间力学与抗液化能力的差异。同时考虑到土体超固结状态与密实度间的关系

模型也从超固结状态的角度很好的解释了土体抗液化能力与相对密度的关系

且与液化试验实测结果取得了较高的一致性。

Abstract

Considering soil turns into overconsolidated state once experiences stress unloading under cyclic loading

and the state of overconsolidation could affects the mechanical properties and liquefaction characteristics in turn

in this paper

with taking the influence of overconsolidation factor into consideration

comparative numerical studies of mechanical properties and liquefaction characteristics between clayey and sandy soils are carried out in the unified subloading surface Cam-clay model.The research results show that compared with clayey soil

sandy soil has higher compressibility

stronger nonlinear characteristics

and more tends to liquefy under undrained cyclic loading test.Through precisely simulates the effect of overconsolidation

as well as the evolution of OCR

the different mechanical properties and liquefaction resistance between clayey and sandy soils are well simulated in the unified theoretical framework.At the same time

considering the relationship between overconsolidation and relative density of soil

the model also well explained the relationship between liquefaction resistance and overconsolidated state of soil

and achieved high consistency with the observed experimental liquefaction test results.

关键词

Keywords

references

基于密度控制理论的饱和黄土地基抗液化处理指标研究 [J]. 王谦,王兰民,王峻,高中南. 岩土工程学报 . 2013(S2)

土的基本特性、本构关系及数值模拟研究综述 [J]. 姚仰平,张丙印,朱俊高. 土木工程学报 . 2012(03)

Behavior of large post-liquefaction deformation in saturated Nanjing fine sand [J]. Pan Hua1, Chen Guoxing1,2, Liu Hanlong2 and Wang Binghui1 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009, China 2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration . 2011(02)

液化地基侧向流动引起的桩基础破坏分析 [J]. 王睿,张建民,张嘎. 岩土力学 . 2011(S1)

黄土及一般含细粒土体液化判别方法研究 [D]. 董林. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 2016

液化土层地震动和场地液化识别方法研究 [D]. 孙锐. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 2006

计算土力学[M]. 人民交通出版社 , 张峰, 2007

Seismic dynamics of offshore breakwater on liquefiable seabed foundation [J] . Jianhong Ye,Gang Wang. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering . 2015

Fines-content effects on liquefaction hazard evaluation for infrastructure in Christchurch, New Zealand [J] . B.W. Maurer,R.A. Green,M. Cubrinovski,B.A. Bradley. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering . 2014

Effect of overconsolidation ratio on dynamic properties of binary mixtures of silica particles [J] . H. Choo,S.E. Burns. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering . 2014

Cyclic lateral response of pile foundations in offshore platforms [J] . Mohammad Mahdi Memarpour,Mehrdad Kimiaei,Mohsenali Shayanfar,Mostafa Khanzadi. Computers and Geotechnics . 2011

Early history of soil–structure interaction [J] . Eduardo Kausel. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering . 2009 (9)

Influence of the ground profile on the reduction of earthquake motion at the filled man-made islands in the Kobe harbor during the 1995 Hyogoken Nambu earthquake [J] . Tadahiro Fukusumi,Hitodhi Ozaki,Masao Koba. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering . 2002 (9)

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

高填方多级挡墙路堤变形及稳定性分析

考虑埋深影响的长江下游江苏地区粘性土动剪切模量与阻尼比试验研究