纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
[1]王智超,周芊妤,熊赟,胡茜.高填方多级挡墙路堤变形及稳定性分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2018,38(06):980-988.
王智超, 周芊妤, 熊赟, et al. Deformation and Stability of High-filled Embankment with Multilevel Retaining Walls[J]. 2018, 38(6): 980-988.
[1]王智超,周芊妤,熊赟,胡茜.高填方多级挡墙路堤变形及稳定性分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2018,38(06):980-988. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2018.06.012.
王智超, 周芊妤, 熊赟, et al. Deformation and Stability of High-filled Embankment with Multilevel Retaining Walls[J]. 2018, 38(6): 980-988. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2018.06.012.
针对高填方路堤回填料分层碾压施工中呈现出超固结、剪胀和时间相依等复杂变形特征
以高填方多级挡墙路堤为例
通过现场勘查、室内试验以及变形监测获得回填土石料的力学性质
分别采用摩尔库仑、修正剑桥以及基于下负荷面的弹粘塑性二次开发本构模型
逐步表征路堤回填料的超固结、剪胀以及时间相依变形行为
并结合单元试验以及现场沉降监测数据反演综合确定三种本构模型材料
对比分析三种本构模型模拟高填方路堤施工及工后变形的差异
最后利用有限元强度折减法分析该高填方多级挡墙路堤的稳定性。计算结果表明:在路堤填筑初期(21d)
基于下负荷面的弹粘塑性模型和修正剑桥模型相比摩尔库仑模型考虑了先期固结应力
计算沉降量结果稍小;随着施工填筑的进行(100d)
一旦超过先期固结应力后
三种模型的沉降量变化逐渐接近;随着时间的增长
仅基于下负荷面的弹粘塑性模型能计算路堤的长期沉降
预测该路堤顶10a工后沉降17cm
满足工后沉降要求;同时发现路堤水平侧移呈"S"型内倾的变化特点
且通过有限元法强度折减计算得到边坡稳定性最小安全系数和最危险滑动面
均满足边坡稳定性要求
路堤边坡的失稳预警位移为4.6cm。
Aiming at the complicated characteristics of embankment fillings such as over-consolidation
dilatancy
and time-dependent deformation under hierarchical compaction
a high-filled embankment with multilevel retaining walls was took as an example to study the mechanical properties of backfill soil by means of site survey
indoor test and deformation monitoring.The Mohrcoulomb model
Modified Cam-clay model and an elastic-viscoplastic constitutive model based on sub-loading yield surface were used in turn to reproduce the over-consolidation
diatancy and time-dependent behaviors of embankment backfill.The parameters of the above three constitutive models were comprehensively determined by data inversion of unit test and field settlement monitoring.Settlement during and after embankment construction obtained from the three models was compared analyzed
and the stability of the embankment was investigated through the finite element strength reduction method.The results show that since the pre-consolidation pressure was taken into account
the settlement calculated through the elastic-viscoplastic constitutive model and the modified Cam-clay model is smaller than that through the Mohr-Coulomb model during the initial stages of construction(21 days).The predicted settlements obtained by the three models are close to each other when the consolidation stress exceeds the pre-consolidation pressure during the process of construction(100 days).However
only the elastic-viscoplastic constitutive model based on sub-loading yield surface can predict the long-term settlement of the embankment
and the simulated post-construction settlement at the embankment surface is 17 cm at the end of the 10 th year after construction
which satisfies the post-construction settlement requirement.A′S′shape is observed in the horizontal displacement curve of the embankment.Both the factor of safety and the critical sliding surface obtained through strength reduction method can well meet the requirements of slope stability.The warning displacement for ensuring the stability of the embankment slope is 4.6 cm.
非饱和压实土率相关变形特征与时效模型 [J]. 王智超,金刚,吴晓峰,邓旭华,董辉. 岩土力学 . 2016(03)
考虑时间效应的UH模型 [J]. 姚仰平,孔令明,胡晶. 中国科学:技术科学 . 2013(03)
超固结非饱和土的本构关系 [J]. 姚仰平,牛雷,崔文杰,万征. 岩土工程学报 . 2011(06)
强度折减有限元法在昆明新机场高填方边坡稳定分析中的应用 [J]. 陈金锋,宋二祥,徐明. 岩土力学 . 2011(S1)
关于强度折减有限元方法中边坡失稳判据的讨论 [J]. 刘金龙,栾茂田,赵少飞,袁凡凡,王吉利. 岩土力学 . 2005(08)
高填石路堤地基沉降计算方法研究 [J]. 曹喜仁,赵振勇,赵明华. 公路交通科技 . 2005(06)
高填方路堤粘弹性参数反演与工后沉降预测分析 [J]. 吕庆,尚岳全,陈允法,侯利国. 岩石力学与工程学报 . 2005(07)
高填石路堤工后沉降分析及工程算法探讨 [J]. 曹喜仁,钟守滨,淤永和,黎莉. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版) . 2002(06)
用有限元强度折减法进行边坡稳定分析 [J]. 郑颖人,赵尚毅,张鲁渝. 中国工程科学 . 2002(10)
用有限元强度折减法求边坡稳定安全系数 [J]. 赵尚毅,郑颖人,时卫民,王敬林. 岩土工程学报 . 2002(03)
强度折减有限元法研究开挖边坡的稳定性 [J]. 连镇营,韩国城,孔宪京. 岩土工程学报 . 2001(04)
考虑材料粘弹性机场高填方道床沉降分析 [J]. 韩世莲,陈荣生. 中国公路学报 . 1999(S1)
Long-term consolidation analysis of a large-scale embankment construction on soft clay deposits using an elasto-viscoplastic model [J] . Mojtaba Mirjalili,Sayuri Kimoto,Fusao Oka,Tatsuo Hattori. Soils and Foundations . 2012 (1)
0
浏览量
123
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
苏公网安备32010202012147号
