纸质出版:2017
移动端阅览
[1]管民生,杜宏彪,崔杰.基于刚度退化的钢筋混凝土结构抗震性能指标对比分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2017,37(03):354-361.
管民生, 杜宏彪, 崔杰. Comparative Analysis of Seismic Performance Indices Based on Stiffness Degradation for Reinforced Concrete Structures[J]. 2017, 37(3): 354-361.
[1]管民生,杜宏彪,崔杰.基于刚度退化的钢筋混凝土结构抗震性能指标对比分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2017,37(03):354-361. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2017.03.004.
管民生, 杜宏彪, 崔杰. Comparative Analysis of Seismic Performance Indices Based on Stiffness Degradation for Reinforced Concrete Structures[J]. 2017, 37(3): 354-361. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2017.03.004.
地震作用下
钢筋混凝土结构的损伤程度可由刚度退化参数量化。基于纤维模型建立了3层钢筋混凝土框架结构有限元模型
分别进行了3种水平侧向加载模式的静力弹塑性分析和弹塑性动力时程分析。依据结构耗能分析
对比了作者提出的刚度退化性能指标Dperformance与Kunnath和Jenne指标DKJ评价结果的差异
并采用Dperformance性能指标对结构楼层在不同地震水准下的破坏程度进行了定量评价。研究表明
Dperformance性能指标对结构水平侧向加载模式不敏感
并能判别结构各楼层的损伤情况
从而确定结构薄弱层的位置
能合理、可靠地评估结构在地震作用下的性能水平。
Reinforced concrete structures are likely to suffer damage when subjected to earthquakes.In this paper
a new stiffness-based damage index proposed previously by some of authors was compared with Kunnath and Jenne index for their applicability in seismic damage evaluation.A fiber model for three-storey reinforced concrete frame structure designed according to the current seismic codes was established.Pushover analyses with three lateral load patterns and the dynamic time histories for typical ground motions of varying intensities were performed on the structure.According to the results of structural energy dissipation
the difference in the estimation of structural damage states between the two examined indicators was studied.Moreover
local storey damage extent of the reinforced concrete structure subjected to varying ground motion intensities was assessed by adopting the proposed damage index.The results show that the proposed damage index is not sensitive to the lateral load patterns for pushover analysis.As a result
the storey and the overall damage of the structure can be quantified by using the abovementioned damage index.And thus the weak storey can also be found.The proposed damage index demonstrates a rational way to predict the extent of damage to structures under an earthquake.
钢筋混凝土框架结构的抗震性能指标研究 [J]. 管民生,韩大建,杜宏彪,吴炎海. 深圳大学学报(理工版) . 2011(03)
汶川地震中典型RC框架结构的震害仿真与分析 [J]. 林旭川,潘鹏,叶列平,陆新征,赵世春. 土木工程学报 . 2009(05)
带加强层的高层建筑结构性能水准的量化 [J]. 杨克家,梁兴文,李波. 工业建筑 . 2007(12)
基于性态的砌块砌体结构极限性态目标位移确定方法的研究 [J]. 屈成忠,谢礼立. 地震工程与工程振动 . 2003(02)
改进的钢筋混凝土结构双参数地震破坏模型 [J]. 牛荻涛,任利杰. 地震工程与工程振动 . 1996(04)
抗震结构的破坏准则评述及探讨 [J]. 刘伯权,白绍良,赖明. 重庆建筑工程学院学报 . 1993(04)
基于性能的钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震性能评价方法与应用研究 [D]. 管民生. 华南理工大学 2011
Selection of the Most Unfavorable Real Ground Motions for Low- and Mid-rise RC Frame Structures [J] . Changhai Zhai,Zhiwang Chang,Shuang Li,Lili Xie. Journal of Earthquake Engineering . 2013 (8)
Interdependence between damage indices and ground motion parameters based on Hilbert–Huang transform [J] . P F Alvanitopoulos,I Andreadis,A Elenas. Measurement Science and Technology . 2010 (2)
Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: a multi-disciplinary review [J] . Adrian M. Chandler,Nelson T.K. Lam. Engineering Structures . 2001 (12)
Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development [J] . Ahmed Ghobarah. Engineering Structures . 2001 (8)
Innovation in earthquake resistant concrete structure design philosophies; a century of progress since Hennebique’s patent [J] . K.G Smith. Engineering Structures . 2000 (1)
Response‐based damage assessment of structures [J] . A.Ghobarah,H.Abou‐Elfath,AshrafBiddah. Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn. . 1999 (1)
Observed Stress‐Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete [J] . J. B. Mander,M. J. N. Priestley,R. Park. Journal of Structural Engineering . 1988 (8)
0
浏览量
169
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
苏公网安备32010202012147号
