纸质出版:2012
移动端阅览
[1]马超,胡凯衡,崔鹏,雷发洪.汶川地震灾区坡面和沟谷泥石流冲出距离计算方法[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2012,32(06):759-765.
马超, 胡凯衡, 崔鹏, et al. Empircial Approaches to Caculating Runout Distance of Hillslope Debris Flow and Channelized Debris Flow in Wenchuan Earthquake Zone[J]. 2012, 32(6): 759-765.
[1]马超,胡凯衡,崔鹏,雷发洪.汶川地震灾区坡面和沟谷泥石流冲出距离计算方法[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2012,32(06):759-765. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2012.06.020.
马超, 胡凯衡, 崔鹏, et al. Empircial Approaches to Caculating Runout Distance of Hillslope Debris Flow and Channelized Debris Flow in Wenchuan Earthquake Zone[J]. 2012, 32(6): 759-765. DOI: 10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2012.06.020.
坡面型和沟谷型泥石流是2种不同的泥石流
不能用单一模型来计算它们的冲出距离。经分类研究
发现它们冲出距离的主影响因子有很大不同:对于沟谷型泥石流
主要是沟道内的松散物质储量;而对于坡面型泥石流
主要是坡面松散体的高度以及体积。2种泥石流的冲出角分布也存在很大差别:研究区沟谷型泥石流的冲出角在29.6°~82.9°之间
表现出"高量级、高冲出角"的特征;坡面型泥石流的冲出角在25°~47°之间
且大部分的冲出角在30°左右
表现出"低量级、低冲出角"的特征。在此分析的基础上
用回归分析方法建立了汶川地震灾区2种不同类型泥石流冲出距离的计算方法。最后
将经验计算方法用陈家坝文家坪坡面泥石流和红椿沟泥石流进行验证
与实际值较为吻合。
Hillslope debris flow and channelized debris flow are very different in formation and movement.This indicates their runout distances cannot be described by a single model.Investigation of the two kinds of debris flow in the Wenchuan earthquake zone shows that the principal factors influencing the runout distances are different.For channelized debris flow
the principal factor is volume of sediment supply
while for hillslope debris flow the factors are relative height and volume of debris.Comparing with debris flow in Alps area
the run-out angle of the two kinds of debris flow in the earthquake area also exhibits different characteristics.The run-out angle of channelized debris flow ranges from 29.6° to 82.9°
which is characterized by "great magnitude and large runout angle"
whereas the angle of slope debris flow from 25° to 47°
which is characterized by "small magnitude and small runout angle".The data of debris-flow events in Beichuan and Qingping of the earthquake zone were used to respectively derive the empirical formulas for calculating the runout distance of hillslope debris flow and channelized debris flow by statistical regressive method.The resulted formulas were verified by two cases
and can be applied to post-quake debris flow.
四川省8·13特大泥石流灾害特点、成因与启示 [J]. 许强. 工程地质学报 . 2010(05)
Slope Debris Flows in the Wenchuan Earthquake Area [J]. LI Yanfu1,WANG Zhaoyin1*,SHI Wenjing1,WANG Xuzhao2 1 State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084,China 2 Beijing Institute of Geology for Mineral Resources,Beijing,100012,China. Journal of Mountain Science . 2010(03)
四川省都江堰市大干沟地震泥石流 [J]. 张健楠,马煜,张惠惠,李丽,余斌. 山地学报 . 2010(05)
“5·12”汶川地震后北川苏保河流域泥石流危害及特征 [J]. 游勇,柳金峰,陈兴长. 山地学报 . 2010(03)
汶川震区北川县城魏家沟暴雨泥石流灾害调查分析 [J]. 唐川,铁永波. 山地学报 . 2009(05)
汶川地震区泥石流灾害工程防治时机的研究 [J]. 陈晓清,崔鹏,赵万玉. 四川大学学报(工程科学版) . 2009(03)
Debris-flow runout predictions based on the average channel slope (ACS) [J] . Adam B. Prochaska,Paul M. Santi,Jerry D. Higgins,Susan H. Cannon. Engineering Geology . 2008 (1)
Prediction of debris flow inundation areas using empirical mobility relationships [J] . Matteo Berti,Alessandro Simoni. Geomorphology . 2007 (1)
Empirical Relationships for Debris Flows [J] . Dieter Rickenmann. Natural Hazards . 1999 (1)
A Mass-Change Model for the Estimation of Debris-Flow Runout [J] . Susan H. Cannon,William Z. Savage. The Journal of Geology . 1988 (2)
On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides [J] . Adrian E. Scheidegger. Rock Mechanics Felsmechanik Mécanique des Roches . 1973 (4)
0
浏览量
399
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
苏公网安备32010202012147号
