考虑含水率影响的花岗岩残积土边坡地震响应分析∗

刘洪波

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

考虑含水率影响的花岗岩残积土边坡地震响应分析∗

“城市综合防灾与抗灾韧性”专题二:生命线工程防灾减灾论文 | 更新时间：2026-01-04

- 考虑含水率影响的花岗岩残积土边坡地震响应分析∗
- Seismic Response Analysis of Granite Residual Soil Slops Considering the Effect of Water Content
- 防灾减灾工程学报 2023年43卷第2期页码：342-350
- 作者机构：
  
  广州环投增城环保能源有限公司,广东,广州,511301
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(52078285，51878402)资助
- DOI：
  中图分类号： TU416.2
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘洪波. 考虑含水率影响的花岗岩残积土边坡地震响应分析∗[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2023,43(2):342-350.

刘洪波,梁崇旭,刘飞禹.考虑含水率影响的花岗岩残积土边坡地震响应分析∗[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2023,43(2):342-350
刘洪波. 考虑含水率影响的花岗岩残积土边坡地震响应分析∗[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2023,43(2):342-350. DOI：

刘洪波,梁崇旭,刘飞禹.考虑含水率影响的花岗岩残积土边坡地震响应分析∗[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2023,43(2):342-350 DOI：

摘要

基于室内直剪试验，得到不同含水率下花岗岩残积土的强度参数，并采用有限差分软件研究了花岗岩残积土边坡在不同含水率(13%、17%、21%、25%)和地震加速度峰值(0.05g、0.1g、0.2g、0.4g)下的位移场、加速度场和锚杆轴力变化规律。结果表明：在 EL 波作用下，边坡水平位移主要集中在残积土层内。含水率越高、地震峰值加速度越大，同一位置处坡体水平位移越大；PGA 放大系数随着坡高的增加而增大，且表现为趋表放大效应。含水率越高、地震峰值加速度越小，同一位置处 PGA 放大系数越大；预应力锚杆最大轴力位于锚头处，且轴力沿自由段变化较小，而在内锚段由始端向末端逐渐减小。含水率越高、地震峰值加速度越大，同一位置处锚杆轴力越大。当地震加速度峰值较小时(PGA=0.05g)，坡脚处锚杆轴力最大，当地震加速度峰值较大时(PGA=0.4g)，坡顶处锚杆轴力最大。

Abstract

Based on the laboratory direct shear tests， the strength parameters of granite residual soil at different water contents were obtained， and the finite difference software was used to study the dis-placement field， acceleration field and axial force of anchor bolt of granite residual soil slope at differ-ent water contents (13%、17%、21%、25%) and peak seismic acceleration (0.05g、0.1g、0.2g、0.4g). The results show that the horizontal displacement of the slope is mainly concentrated in the residual soil layer under the action of EL wave. The higher the water content and the greater the seismic peak acceleration， the greater the horizontal displacement of the slope at the same location. The amplifica-tion coefficient of PGA increases with the increase of slope height and shows a superficial amplification effect. The higher the water content and the smaller the seismic peak acceleration， the larger the PGA amplification coefficient at the same position. The maximum axial force of the prestressed bolt is locat-ed at the anchor head， and the axial force changes little along the free section， while that of the inner anchor section decreases gradually from the beginning to the end. The higher the water content and the greater the seismic peak acceleration， the greater the axial force of bolt at the same position. When the peak seismic acceleration is small (PGA=0.05g)， the bolt axial force is the largest at the foot of slope. When the peak seismic acceleration is large (PGA=0.4g)， the bolt axial force is the largest at the top of slope.

关键词

Keywords

references

詹良通,李鹤,陈云敏,等.东南沿海残积土地区降雨诱发型滑坡预报雨强-历时曲线的影响因素分析[J].岩土力学,2012,33(3):872-880,886.Zhan L T,Li H,Chen Y M,et al.Parametric analysesof intensity-duration curve for predicting rainfall-inducedlandslides in residual soil slop[J].Rock and Soil Me?chanics,2012,33(3):872-880,886.(in Chinese)

安然,孔令伟,黎澄生,等.炎热多雨气候下花岗岩残积土的强度衰减与微结构损伤规律[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(9):1902-1911.An R,Kong L W,Li C S,et al.Strength attenuationand microstructure damage of granite residual soils un?der hot and rainy weather[J].Chinese Journal of RockMechanics and Engineering,2020,39(9):1902-1911.(in Chinese)

Kim K S,Kim M I,Lee M S,et al.Regression equationsfor estimating landslide-triggering factors using soil char?acteristics[J].Applied Sciences,2020,10(10):3560.

李江,邓斌.花岗岩残积土在周期荷载下力学特性的实验研究[J].岩土力学,1989,10(4):31-43.Li J,Deng B.Experimental study on mechanical prop?erties of granite residual soil under periodic load[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,1989,10(4):31-43.(inChinese)

李剑,陈善雄,余飞,等.预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J].岩土力学,2020,41(2):707-713.Li J,Chen S X,Yu F,et al.Discussion on mechanismof reinforcing high and steep slope with prestressed an?chor cable[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2020,41(2):707-713.(in Chinese)

Lin Y L,Lu L,Yang G L.Seismic behavior of a sin?gle-form lattice anchoring structure and a combined re?taining structure supporting soil slope:a comparison[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2020,79(3):78.

Lin Y L,Li Y X,Zhao L H,et al.Investigation onseismic response of a three-stage soil slope supported byanchor frame structure[J].Journal of Central South Uni?versity,2020,27(4):1290-1305.

缪圆冰,吴尚杰,邓涛,等.含软弱夹层锚框支护边坡地震动态响应的数值模拟研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2020,28(4):852-864.Miao Y B,Wu S J,Deng T,et al.Seismic responsesof weak interlayered slope with anchor-frame reinforce?ment based on numerical simulations[J].Journal of Ba?sic Science and Engineering,2020,28(4):852-864.(in Chinese)

李亚鹏,言志信.地震作用下软弱夹层参数对岩质边坡锚固界面剪切作用影响[J].振动与冲击,2019,38(8):48-53,79.Li Y P,Yan Z X.Influence of weak interlayer parame?ters for anchored interface shear action of rock slope un?der earthquake[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2019,38(8):48-53,79.(in Chinese)

言志信,李亚鹏,龙哲,等.双向耦合地震作用下含软弱层岩质边坡锚固界面剪切作用[J].振动与冲击,2020,39(11):158-164.Yan Z X,Li Y P,Long Z,et al.Shearing action of an?chorage interface of rock slope with soft layer under bidi?rectional coupled earthquake[J].Journal of Vibrationand Shock,2020,39(11):158-164.(in Chinese)

言志信,龙哲,屈文瑞,等.地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固界面剪切作用分析[J].岩土力学,2019,40(7):2882-2890.Yan Z X,Long Z,Qu W R,et al.The effect of shearon the anchorage interface of rock slope with weak lay?ers under earthquake[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2019,40(7):2882-2890.(in Chinese)

祁生文,伍法权,刘春玲,等.地震边坡稳定性的工程地质分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(16):2792-2797.Qi S W,Wu F Q,Liu C L,et al.Engineering geologyanalysis on stability of slope under earthquake[J].Chi?nese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2004,23(16):2792-2797.(in Chinese)

Cao L C,Zhang J J,Wang Z J,et al.Dynamic responseand dynamic failure mode of the slope subjected to earth?quake and rainfall[J].Landslides,2019,16(8):1467-1482.

Chen J C,Wang L M,Pu X W,et al.Experimentalstudy on the dynamic characteristics of low-angle loessslope under the influence of long-and short-term effectsof rainfall before earthquake[J].Engineering Geology,2020,273:105684.

Ren F F,Huang Q Q,Wang G.Shaking table tests onreinforced soil retaining walls subjected to the combinedeffects of rainfall and earthquakes[J].Engineering Geol?ogy,2020,267:105475.

Chen Y L,Liu G Y,Li N,et al.Stability evaluation ofslope subjected to seismic effect combined with conse?quent rainfall[J].Engineering Geology,2020,266.

Zhang X,Huang L,Hou Y,et al.Study on the stabili?ty of the geogrids-reinforced earth slope under the cou?pling effect of rainfall and earthquake[J].MathematicalProblems in Engineering,2020,2020:1-11.

尹松,孔令伟,杨爱武,等.循环振动作用下残积土动力变形特性试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2017,36(11):224-231.Yin S,Kong L W,Yang A W,et al.Experimentalstudy on dynamic deformation characteristics of residualsoil under cyclic vibration[J].Journal of Vibration andImpact,2017,36(11):224-231.(in Chinese)

Liu F Y,Ying M J,Yuan G H,et al.Particle shape ef?fects on the cyclic shear behaviour of the soil?geogrid in?terface[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2021,49(4):991-1003.

汪班桥,郝建斌,黄毓挺,等.滑坡防治格构梁锚杆地震动力响应分析[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2016,48(3):48-54.Wang B Q,Hao J B,Huang Y T,et al.Dynamic re?sponse for framed anchors in landslide prevention underearthquake[J].Journal of Sichuan University(Engineer?ing Science Edition),2016,48(3):48-54.(in Chinese)

浏览量

432

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同含水率下考虑筋土界面刚度软化的加筋边坡地震响应

建筑地震响应的视觉监测与虚拟现实验证

断层场地非线性驱动的跨断层隧道地震响应机制研究

SV/P波斜入射下岩溶盾构隧道的地震响应和损伤研究

不同上部结构高宽比的土‑桩‑隔震结构体系地震响应分析