盐城响水化工园区“3·21”危化品爆炸事故爆炸威力分析及灾害后果评估∗

陈大鹏

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

盐城响水化工园区“3·21”危化品爆炸事故爆炸威力分析及灾害后果评估∗

更新时间：2025-09-25

- 盐城响水化工园区“3·21”危化品爆炸事故爆炸威力分析及灾害后果评估∗
- Analysis on the Power and Disaster Consequences of “3·21” Explosion Accident in the Chemical Industry Park of Xiangshui, Yancheng
- 防灾减灾工程学报 2020年第2期页码：196-203
- 作者机构：
  
  陆军工程大学爆炸冲击防灾减灾国家重点实验室,江苏,南京,210007
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目（51622812;51738011）资助
- DOI：
  中图分类号： X928.7
- 纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈大鹏,陈力,还毅,徐荣正,刘洋,方秦.盐城响水化工园区“3·21”危化品爆炸事故爆炸威力分析及灾害后果评估∗[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2020,(2):196-203

CHEN Dapeng. Analysis on the Power and Disaster Consequences of “3·21” Explosion Accident in the Chemical Industry Park of Xiangshui, Yancheng[J]. 2020, (2): 196-203.
陈大鹏,陈力,还毅,徐荣正,刘洋,方秦.盐城响水化工园区“3·21”危化品爆炸事故爆炸威力分析及灾害后果评估∗[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2020,(2):196-203 DOI：

CHEN Dapeng. Analysis on the Power and Disaster Consequences of “3·21” Explosion Accident in the Chemical Industry Park of Xiangshui, Yancheng[J]. 2020, (2): 196-203. DOI：

摘要

为分析盐城响水化工园区“3·21”危化品爆炸事故的爆炸威力，通过对爆炸现场进行勘察以及对事故资料进行系统的收集和梳理，基于爆坑尺寸、质点震动速度和建筑物毁伤半径等一系列关键参数，运用3种不同方法综合计算出此次爆炸的等效TNT当量为340 t。通过进一步归纳分析爆炸灾害现场周边建筑物分布和损伤破坏特点，结合爆炸冲击波传播规律以及相关规范手册，评估此次爆炸对建筑物和人员的毁伤后果。评估结果表明：此次爆炸冲击波作用下的人员死亡半径为227 m；人员安全半径为573 m；建筑物摧毁半径为265 m；建筑物安全半径为1 626 m。

Abstract

In order to find out the power of the “3·21” chemical explosion accident in Xiangshui Chemical Industrial Park of Yancheng

the explosion site was surveyed

and the accident data were collected and analyzed systematically. On the basis of a series of key parameters such as crater size

particle vibration velocity and building damage radius

the TNT equivalent of this explosion accident was determined to be 340 tons using three different methods. The distribution and damage characteristics of surrounding buildings at the site of the explosion disaster were further analyzed. Combined with the propagation law of blast wave and relevant specifications

the damage of buildings and the loss of life under this explosion accident were evaluated. The evaluation results show that suffering the impact of the blast wave

the radius of casualty is 227 m

the safety radius for life is 573 m

the destruction radius of buildings is 265 m

and the safety radius for buildings is 1 626 m.

关键词

Keywords

references

危险货物分类和品名编号:GB6944—2012[S].北京:中国国家标准化管理委员会,2012. Classification and code of dangerous goods:GB6944—2012[S].Beijing:Standardization Administration of the People’ Republic of China,2012.(in Chinese)

陈武争,陈大鹏,陈力,等.基于蒙特卡洛法的集装箱堆场危险品爆炸威力计算模型[J].振动与冲击,2019,38(16):233-238. Chen W Zh,Chen D P,Chen L,et al.A calculation model of explosion power of dangerous goods stacked in container yards based on Monte Carlo method [J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2019,38(16):233-238.(in Chinese)

胡广霞,段晓瑞.危险货物集装箱堆场爆炸地震效应对地下结构的安全影响分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(4):142-147. Hu G X,Duan X R.Analysis on safety influence of seismic effect by explosion in container yard of dangerous goods on underground structure [J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(4):142-147.(in Chinese)

王杰,孔德仁,李丽萍,等.爆炸场地震波对模拟目标振动响应的实验研究[J].测试技术学报,2015,29(6):484-489. Wang J,Kong D R,Li L P,et al.Experimental study on viaration response of simulation target caused by shock wave in blast field [J].Journal of Test and Measurement Technology,2015,29(6):484-489.(in Chinese)

贾永胜,王维国,谢先启,等.低含水率砂土和饱和砂土场地爆炸成坑特性实验[J].爆炸与冲击,2017,37(5):799-806. Jia Y Sh,Wang W G,Xie X Q,et al.Characterization of blast-induced craters in low-moisture and saturated sand from field experiments [J].Explosion and Shock Waves,2017,37(5):799-806.(in Chinese)

黄郑华.烟花爆竹火灾爆炸事故伤害范围分析评估[J].消防技术与产品信息,2012,25(7):20-23. Huang Zh H.Analysis and evaluation of damage range of fireworks and firecrackers fire and explosion accidents [J].Fire Protection Technology and Product Information,2012,25(7):20-23.(in Chinese)

UFC 3-340-01.Design and analysis of hardened structures to conventional weapon effects [S].Washington：The Departments of the Army,1998.

U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Naval Facilities Engineering Command(Preparing Activity),Air force civil engineer support agency 3-340-02(TM5-1300).Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions[S].US:U.S.Department of Defense,2008.

Baker W E,Cox P A,Westine P S,et al.Explosion hazards and evaluation[M].New York:Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company,1983.

方秦,杨石刚,陈力,等.天津港“8·12”特大火灾爆炸事故建筑物和人员损伤破坏情况及其爆炸威力分析[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(3):12-18. Fang Q,Yang Sh G,Chen L,et al.Analysis on the building damage，personnel casualties and blast energy of the “8·12” explosion in Tianjin port [J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2017，50(3):12-18.(in Chinese)

徐志胜．?安全系统工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社，2007. Xu Zh Sh.Safety system engineering[M].Beijing:China Machine Press,2007.(in Chinese)

李梅,蒋建伟,王昕.复合装药空气中爆炸冲击波传播特性[J].爆炸与冲击,2018,38(2):367-372. Li M,Jiang J W,Wang X.Shock wave propagation characteristics of double layer charge explosion in the air [J].Explosion and Shock Waves,2018,38(2):367-372.(in Chinese)

王可强,苏经宇,王志涛.爆炸冲击波在建筑群中传播规律的数值模拟研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2007，17(10):121-127，176. Wang K Q,Su J Y,Wang Zh T.Numerical simulation of propagation rules of blast shock wave in building cluster [J].China Safety Science Journal,2007，17(10):121-127，176.(in Chinese)

耿振刚,李秀地,苗朝阳,等.温压炸药爆炸冲击波在坑道内的传播规律研究[J].振动与冲击,2017,36(5):23-29. Geng Zh G,Li X D,Miao Ch Y,et al.Propagation of blast wave of thermobaric explosive inside a tunnel [J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2017,36(5):23-29.(in Chinese)

骆浩浩,李祥龙,王建国,等.井下大爆破直通巷道冲击波超压的预测研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(3):57-62. Luo H H,Li X L,Wang J G,et al.Study on peak overpressure prediction of underground blasting shock waves on straight-through roadways[J].China Safety Science Journal,2019,29(3):57-62.(in Chinese)

浏览量

420

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据